RT Article
T1 Pastoral Care Professionals in Health and Mental Health Care: Recognizing Classic and Newer Versions of Ageism
JF Journal of pastoral care & counseling
VO 65
IS 4
SP 1
OP 9
A1 Kane, Michael N.
A1 Green, Diane L.
A1 Jacobs, Robin J.
LA English
PB Sage Publishing
YR 2011
UL https://ixtheo.de/Record/1809848776
AB Pastoral care professionals are cognizant of many forms of prejudice and discrimination in society and health care environments. Ageism is perhaps the least likely to be challenged as prejudice or discrimination. Ageist perception is suspicious of the health and cognitive ability of older persons; without consideration of emotional, spiritual, or social abilities. While positive and negative ageist attributions are culturally abundant, new and subtle versions of ageism offer convincing guidance about personal responsibility for health status and insist on personal social engagement. Older persons who are not free of disease or disability may be viewed as culpable for their failure to age well. Additionally, elders may be expected to maintain social involvement; especially through volunteerism. Elders who are unable or unwilling to engage in volunteerism may be viewed as selfish or irresponsible. If individuals are held responsible for their health as they age, then services and reimbursement for service may be limited to evidence-based medical interventions that result in complete recovery rather than life-quality improvement and only for “worthy” individuals. This paper seeks to heighten the awareness of pastoral care professionals to common ageist themes found in health and mental care service delivery.
K1 healthy aging
K1 Successful Aging
K1 Ageism
K1 Pastoral Care
DO 10.1177/154230501106500405