Isomorphic Indicators in Theological and Psychological Science

The culture split between science and theology by which theology tends to abandon the concrete observable world to science, while science tends to dismiss questions of ontology (God), is presented as a framework within which to examine the preceding articles in this issue. The inadequacy of attempti...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Anderson, Ray S. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Sage Publishing 1989
In: Journal of psychology and theology
Year: 1989, Volume: 17, Issue: 4, Pages: 368-375
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Non-electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 180901848X
003 DE-627
005 20220704090259.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220704s1989 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1177/009164718901700407  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)180901848X 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP180901848X 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Anderson, Ray S.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Anderson, Ray S.  |a Sherman Anderson, Ray  |a Anderson, Ray Sherman 
245 1 0 |a Isomorphic Indicators in Theological and Psychological Science 
264 1 |c 1989 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The culture split between science and theology by which theology tends to abandon the concrete observable world to science, while science tends to dismiss questions of ontology (God), is presented as a framework within which to examine the preceding articles in this issue. The inadequacy of attempting to bridge this dichotomy by constructing a synthesis between psychology and theology on the common ground of religious experience is shown. An alternative approach to theology as having its focus on the interaction between the human self, others and God is presented, suggesting that a convergence between theology and psychology can be found in their common interest in the nature of the human self as being-in-becoming. This convergence is examined as an isomorphic structure where, despite different “ancestry,” theology and psychology attempt to explain and give meaning to human experience as grounded in being (ontology), experienced in a knowing way (epistemology), and open to change by the reality of transcendent being which moves the self toward goals which offer healing and hope (teleology). 
601 |a Theologe 
601 |a Psychologie 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of psychology and theology  |d London : Sage Publishing, 1973  |g 17(1989), 4, Seite 368-375  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)341346381  |w (DE-600)2067352-8  |w (DE-576)273869256  |x 2328-1162  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:17  |g year:1989  |g number:4  |g pages:368-375 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Druckausgabe  |w (DE-627)163950799X  |k Non-Electronic 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1177/009164718901700407  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4160908799 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 180901848X 
LOK |0 005 20220704090259 
LOK |0 008 220704||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-06-22#3B19C80CA01ED6C485114FC24AA6686BC93EBF1E 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
OAS |a 1  |b inherited from superior work 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw