Religion, Psychology, and Science: Steps toward a Wider Psychology of Religion

The psychology of religion historically has defined itself with great difficulty, and general psychologists have been reluctant to investigate religious phenomena. General or introductory psychology textbooks, which play a “gate-keeping” role for the discipline of psychology, typically disregard any...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Andrews, Allan R. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Sage Publishing 1979
In: Journal of psychology and theology
Year: 1979, Volume: 7, Issue: 1, Pages: 31-38
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Non-electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1809014999
003 DE-627
005 20220704090251.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220704s1979 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1177/009164717900700105  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1809014999 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1809014999 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Andrews, Allan R.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Religion, Psychology, and Science: Steps toward a Wider Psychology of Religion 
264 1 |c 1979 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The psychology of religion historically has defined itself with great difficulty, and general psychologists have been reluctant to investigate religious phenomena. General or introductory psychology textbooks, which play a “gate-keeping” role for the discipline of psychology, typically disregard any systematic study of the psychology of religion, as is shown in a small, informal sample of these textbooks. The problem of definition not only plagues the psychology of religion because religion is so elusive a phenomenon; it also exists in mainstream psychology, where a clear definition of the field has been controversial since the formal beginnings of the discipline in the late nineteenth century. It is suggested that the problems of definition in both religion and psychology can be traced to the endemic definition of science. In psychology, science is often narrowly defined and aligned exclusively with experimental methodology. Introductory textbooks are strong in their implications of this narrow view of science, often to the point of dismissing or diminishing religious ways of knowing. A clearer definition of the psychology of religion should emerge from the adoption of a wider definition of science, a definition that recognizes and acknowledges that scientific knowing is a second-order abstraction from the primary reality of human personal experience. 
601 |a Religion 
601 |a Psychologie 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of psychology and theology  |d London : Sage Publishing, 1973  |g 7(1979), 1, Seite 31-38  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)341346381  |w (DE-600)2067352-8  |w (DE-576)273869256  |x 2328-1162  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:7  |g year:1979  |g number:1  |g pages:31-38 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Druckausgabe  |w (DE-627)1644726157  |k Non-Electronic 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1177/009164717900700105  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 7  |j 1979  |e 1  |h 31-38 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4160905188 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1809014999 
LOK |0 005 20220704090251 
LOK |0 008 220704||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-06-22#782302C2AA231218F1D2C4CFB6FFB07ADF391302 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
OAS |a 1  |b inherited from superior work 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw