Adams’ Theory of Nouthetic Counseling

Adams’ theory of nouthetic counseling was analyzed with reference to the nature of man, view of pathology, the counseling model, the counseling process, and the counselor and his techniques. Biblically, Adams’ theory is found to be inadequate. It views man almost entirely in behavioral terms and fai...

Descrizione completa

Salvato in:  
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autore principale: Carter, John D. 1934-2022 (Autore)
Tipo di documento: Elettronico Articolo
Lingua:Inglese
Verificare la disponibilità: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Pubblicazione: 1975
In: Journal of psychology and theology
Anno: 1975, Volume: 3, Fascicolo: 3, Pagine: 143-155
Accesso online: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002c 4500
001 1809012643
003 DE-627
005 20240913154118.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220704s1975 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1177/009164717500300301  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1809012643 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1809012643 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1341942023  |0 (DE-627)1902538765  |4 aut  |a Carter, John D.  |d 1934-2022 
109 |a Carter, John D. 1934-2022  |a Carter, J. D. 1934-2022  |a Carter, John Daniel 1934-2022  |a Carter, John 1934-2022 
245 1 0 |a Adams’ Theory of Nouthetic Counseling 
264 1 |c 1975 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Adams’ theory of nouthetic counseling was analyzed with reference to the nature of man, view of pathology, the counseling model, the counseling process, and the counselor and his techniques. Biblically, Adams’ theory is found to be inadequate. It views man almost entirely in behavioral terms and fails to incorporate such biblical concepts as heart, soul, spirit, and flesh. Adams also fails to provide a biblical basis for building his theory around the word noutheteo. Psychologically, Adams offers no emperical support for his theory and seems unaware of the methodological and research problems involved in supporting his claims of success. Adams’ criticism of Rogers and Freud shows a lack of knowledge of primary sources, and his uncritical positive bias toward Mowrer and Skinner reflects an uncritical presuppositionalism. Finally, he has no theory of motivation or theory of personality. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of psychology and theology  |d London : Sage Publishing, 1973  |g 3(1975), 3, Seite 143-155  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)341346381  |w (DE-600)2067352-8  |w (DE-576)273869256  |x 2328-1162  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:3  |g year:1975  |g number:3  |g pages:143-155 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1177/009164717500300301  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4160902790 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1809012643 
LOK |0 005 20220704090246 
LOK |0 008 220704||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-06-22#2479785FA3911E913F60CE22775CEF27E370EB5D 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
OAS |a 1  |b inherited from superior work 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw