C.S. Lewis on the Actuality of the Incarnation: Triune Simultaneity and the Will of God

C.S. Lewis eschewed the multifarious and apparently contradictory atonement theories, yet he implicitly promulgated specifically ‘debt’ and ‘ransom’ models. Within his understanding of the Cross as the central mechanism of atonement Lewis tackled the paradox of Incarnation through a proposition, alm...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Brazier, P.H. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Sage 2013
In: The Downside review
Year: 2013, Volume: 131, Issue: 463, Pages: 87-102
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Non-electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1808971310
003 DE-627
005 20220704090102.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220704s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1177/001258061313146303  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1808971310 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1808971310 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Brazier, P.H.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a C.S. Lewis on the Actuality of the Incarnation: Triune Simultaneity and the Will of God 
264 1 |c 2013 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a C.S. Lewis eschewed the multifarious and apparently contradictory atonement theories, yet he implicitly promulgated specifically ‘debt’ and ‘ransom’ models. Within his understanding of the Cross as the central mechanism of atonement Lewis tackled the paradox of Incarnation through a proposition, almost a motif, of analogical narrative in which he sought to explain the actuality of the Incarnation: how God could be made in human flesh (John 1:14a), grounded in triune simultaneity – how God could be both eternal and actual After examining the ‘why’ and ‘how’ of revelation, we can analyse Lewis's statement: ‘if Shakespeare and Hamlet could ever meet, it must be Shakespeare's doing’. Lewis's proposition raises questions about temporality, and modernist objections to theistic belief, but essentially about the will of the triune God. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t The Downside review  |d London : Sage, 1880  |g 131(2013), 463, Seite 87-102  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)853803978  |w (DE-600)2850543-8  |w (DE-576)462734986  |x 2397-3498  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:131  |g year:2013  |g number:463  |g pages:87-102 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Druckausgabe  |w (DE-627)1637142153  |k Non-Electronic 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1177/001258061313146303  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4160860540 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1808971310 
LOK |0 005 20220704090102 
LOK |0 008 220704||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-06-15#CC3AF32818862775463E361F661855D0123EECD0 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw