[Rezension von: Dever, William G., 1933-, Has archaeology buried the bible?]

A distinguished archaeologist who already has a long list of popular as well as scholarly books to his name tackles once more the perennial question of the historicity of the Bible, underlining that this book is ‘meant to be truly popular’. It is evidently aimed at an American Bible-reading public....

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Houston, Walter (Author)
Contributors: Dever, William G. 1933- (Bibliographic antecedent)
Format: Electronic Review
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Oxford University Press 2021
In: The journal of theological studies
Year: 2021, Volume: 72, Issue: 2, Pages: 878-880
Review of:Has archaeology buried the bible? (Grand Rapids, Michigan : William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2020) (Houston, Walter)
Has archaeology buried the bible? (Grand Rapids : William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2020) (Houston, Walter)
Further subjects:B Book review
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:A distinguished archaeologist who already has a long list of popular as well as scholarly books to his name tackles once more the perennial question of the historicity of the Bible, underlining that this book is ‘meant to be truly popular’. It is evidently aimed at an American Bible-reading public. While Dever is clear about the unhistoricity of many parts of the biblical narrative, there is a strong element of apologetic in the book, in which he attempts to sketch the religious and moral value even of parts of the story which have low credibility as history. The book is concerned only with the Old Testament narrative, and then only up to the fall of Jerusalem. Dever considers that at that point ‘the six-hundred-year history of Israel and Judah comes to an end’, and, following R. E. Friedman, that ‘Yahweh simply disappears [Dever’s italics] . . . His word, spoken through the earlier prophets, falls silent’ (p. 103). A strange opinion in view of such important prophetic collections as those of Ezekiel, Isaiah 40-55, Haggai, Zechariah, and Malachi.
ISSN:1477-4607
Contains:Enthalten in: The journal of theological studies
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1093/jts/flab090