Triplex Via and the ‘Gap Problem’ with Cosmological Arguments

Aquinas’ five ways are often criticized because, unless further argumentation is supplied, their conclusion is not obviously identical to the God of classical theism. Such criticism overlooks the semantic and hermeneutic functions of natural theology. By fixing the referent for the word ‘God’, the f...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:New blackfriars
Main Author: Huneeus, Clemente (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell 2022
In: New blackfriars
Year: 2022, Volume: 103, Issue: 1106, Pages: 536-553
Further subjects:B Theology
B natural
B Semantic
B Functions
B Triplex
B Hermeneutic
B via
B Cosmological
B ways
B Five
B problem
B and
B Of
B Gap
B arguments
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Non-electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1807227456
003 DE-627
005 20220618052600.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220618s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/nbfr.12727  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1807227456 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1807227456 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Huneeus, Clemente  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Triplex Via and the ‘Gap Problem’ with Cosmological Arguments 
264 1 |c 2022 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Aquinas’ five ways are often criticized because, unless further argumentation is supplied, their conclusion is not obviously identical to the God of classical theism. Such criticism overlooks the semantic and hermeneutic functions of natural theology. By fixing the referent for the word ‘God’, the five ways allow the philosopher to provide an intelligible account of divinity. This knowledge of the cause through its effects follows the systematic structure of the triplex via (causation, negation, and eminence), a program that guides Aquinas’ account of divine attributes all the way through Summa Theologiae I qq.2-26 and Summa Contra Gentiles I. By following this rational itinerary the demonstrative power of the ways can be better assessed, looking at them not as an apologetic exercise, but as a first step in the seek for a deeper understanding of the divine source of Creation. 
601 |a Problem 
601 |a Argumentation 
650 4 |a Theology 
650 4 |a natural 
650 4 |a Of 
650 4 |a Functions 
650 4 |a Hermeneutic 
650 4 |a and 
650 4 |a Semantic 
650 4 |a – 
650 4 |a via 
650 4 |a Triplex 
650 4 |a – 
650 4 |a ways 
650 4 |a Five 
650 4 |a – 
650 4 |a arguments 
650 4 |a Cosmological 
650 4 |a – 
650 4 |a problem 
650 4 |a Gap 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t New blackfriars  |d Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1964  |g 103(2022), 1106, Seite 536-553  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)377274860  |w (DE-600)2132190-5  |w (DE-576)258584254  |x 1741-2005  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:103  |g year:2022  |g number:1106  |g pages:536-553 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Druckausgabe  |w (DE-627)1815023791  |k Non-Electronic 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/nbfr.12727  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/nbfr.12727  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 103  |j 2022  |e 1106  |h 536-553 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 415215991X 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1807227456 
LOK |0 005 20220618052600 
LOK |0 008 220618||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-06-17#F98672A5E11FA3E28C2CDDFE8F549A713B2C08DD 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw