On Sense and Preference
Determining the precise nature of the connection between preference, choice, and welfare has arguably been the central project in the field of welfare economics, which aims to offer a proper guide for economists in the making of policy decisions that affect people’s welfare. The two leading approach...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Brill
2022
|
| In: |
Journal of moral philosophy
Year: 2022, Volume: 19, Issue: 3, Pages: 280-302 |
| Further subjects: | B
Public Policy
B Well-being B latent preference B Preference B Welfare economics B revealed preference B Behavioral economics |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1806897334 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220614052530.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220614s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1163/17455243-20213579 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1806897334 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1806897334 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Fanciullo, James |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a On Sense and Preference |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Determining the precise nature of the connection between preference, choice, and welfare has arguably been the central project in the field of welfare economics, which aims to offer a proper guide for economists in the making of policy decisions that affect people’s welfare. The two leading approaches here historically – the revealed preference and latent preference approaches – seem equally incapable of so guiding economists. I argue that the deadlock here is due to welfare economists’ failure to recognize a crucial distinction between two senses of “preference.” I analyze and defend these senses of “preference,” and argue that each shares a close connection with just one of choice and welfare. This analysis reveals how economists should conceive of both the connections between “preference,” choice, and welfare, and the proper roles of these concepts in welfare economics. I conclude by showing this analysis to best explain the plausibility of two leading alternative approaches from Hausman and Sugden. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Behavioral economics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a latent preference | |
| 650 | 4 | |a revealed preference | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Public Policy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Welfare economics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Well-being | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Preference | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of moral philosophy |d Leiden : Brill, 2004 |g 19(2022), 3, Seite 280-302 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)474382281 |w (DE-600)2169771-1 |w (DE-576)273875329 |x 1745-5243 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:19 |g year:2022 |g number:3 |g pages:280-302 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1163/17455243-20213579 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://brill.com/view/journals/jmp/19/3/article-p280_003.xml |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4149297029 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1806897334 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20220614052530 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 220614||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-06-13#C25600A369D8D3B37826B3745404E4918A22C54A | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||