Clash of the Titans or Friendly Bedfellows? Freedom of Religion or Belief and Women’s Rights in India
This article uses a case study of India to examine the contested relationship between two sets of human rights—freedom of religion or belief on the one hand, and women’s rights to life, dignity, equality, non-discrimination, sexual autonomy, and bodily integrity on the other. Through a critical anal...
| Главный автор: | |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Опубликовано: |
2022
|
| В: |
The review of faith & international affairs
Год: 2022, Том: 20, Выпуск: 2, Страницы: 81-95 |
| Другие ключевые слова: | B
Patriarchy
B Women’s Rights B freedom of religion or belief B International Human Rights B state obligations B Female Genital Mutilation B India |
| Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1805597671 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20250225101204.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220602s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/15570274.2022.2065808 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1805597671 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1805597671 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Uma, Saumya |e VerfasserIn |0 (orcid)0000-0002-5867-9111 |4 aut | |
| 109 | |a Uma, Saumya |a Saumya, Uma | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Clash of the Titans or Friendly Bedfellows? Freedom of Religion or Belief and Women’s Rights in India |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This article uses a case study of India to examine the contested relationship between two sets of human rights—freedom of religion or belief on the one hand, and women’s rights to life, dignity, equality, non-discrimination, sexual autonomy, and bodily integrity on the other. Through a critical analysis of the practice of female genital mutilation within the Bohra Muslim community, which is currently the subject of a constitutional challenge in the Supreme Court of India, this article illustrates how the contestations between the two sets of rights can be more effectively understood and addressed using the international human rights framework. | ||
| 601 | |a Religion | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a state obligations | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Patriarchy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a International Human Rights | |
| 650 | 4 | |a freedom of religion or belief | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Women’s Rights | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Female Genital Mutilation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a India | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t The review of faith & international affairs |d Arlington, Va. : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2005 |g 20(2022), 2, Seite 81-95 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)662163788 |w (DE-600)2612695-3 |w (DE-576)346017173 |x 1931-7743 |7 nnas |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:20 |g year:2022 |g number:2 |g pages:81-95 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1080/15570274.2022.2065808 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4142227025 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1805597671 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20220602052625 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 220602||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-06-01#B0CF51D6F2A3C7EBDA4F23AE2AFF91665C6C21D9 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||
