Positivism and Reasonableness: Authoritarian Leanings in New Atheism’s Thinking

Various contemporary phenomena of social regression and authoritarianism are related to religious actors, movements, and beliefs. This text, however, seeks to follow this up with the political-theoretical argumentation that New Atheism has to be understood as a way of thinking which carries illibera...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Roseneck, Michael (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: MDPI 2022
In: Religions
Year: 2022, Volume: 13, Issue: 2
Further subjects:B science and society
B Pluralism
B public reason
B rhetoric of reaction
B Democratic theory
B John
B Habermas
B Jürgen
B Rawls
B New Atheism
B Secularism
B Reasonableness
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1804373044
003 DE-627
005 20220525123726.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220525s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.3390/rel13020186  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1804373044 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1804373044 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Roseneck, Michael  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Positivism and Reasonableness: Authoritarian Leanings in New Atheism’s Thinking 
264 1 |c 2022 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Various contemporary phenomena of social regression and authoritarianism are related to religious actors, movements, and beliefs. This text, however, seeks to follow this up with the political-theoretical argumentation that New Atheism has to be understood as a way of thinking which carries illiberal and authoritarian tendencies with it as well. In defence of this position, this article will first reconstruct, with reference to Habermas’s and Rawls’s theory of democracy, elements that must include personal beliefs in order to be considered congruent with democratic values. Subsequently, New Atheism’s conception of rational politics will be presented in order to show in which aspects it contradicts the demands of reasonable convictions. This concerns, in particular, the rejection of reasonable pluralism on the one hand and a non-positivistic view of human beings on the other. As a conclusion, this text supports the proposition that, when speaking of the connection between certain worldviews and today’s illiberalism, New Atheism must also be considered as an unreasonable comprehensive doctrine. 
601 |a Atheismus 
650 4 |a Habermas 
650 4 |a John 
650 4 |a Jürgen 
650 4 |a Rawls 
650 4 |a Democratic theory 
650 4 |a New Atheism 
650 4 |a Pluralism 
650 4 |a public reason 
650 4 |a Reasonableness 
650 4 |a rhetoric of reaction 
650 4 |a science and society 
650 4 |a Secularism 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Religions  |d Basel : MDPI, 2010  |g 13(2022), 2, Artikel-ID 186  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)665435797  |w (DE-600)2620962-7  |w (DE-576)348219067  |x 2077-1444  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:13  |g year:2022  |g number:2  |g elocationid:186 
856 |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/13/2/186/pdf?version=1645418613  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [oa journal (via doaj)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13020186  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/13/2/186  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4139582820 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1804373044 
LOK |0 005 20220525113408 
LOK |0 008 220525||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL 
SYE 0 0 |a John,Johannes,Waltham, John,Capgrave, John,John,Johannes,Capgrave, John