Oppy on Thomistic cosmological arguments
Graham Oppy has criticized several Thomistic versions of the cosmological argument in a series of publications over the years, most recently in a Religious Studies article responding to my book Five Proofs of the Existence of God. Here I reply to his criticisms, arguing that while Oppy raises import...
| Главный автор: | |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Загрузка...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Опубликовано: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
2021
|
| В: |
Religious studies
Год: 2021, Том: 57, Выпуск: 3, Страницы: 503-522 |
| Нормированные ключевые слова (последовательности): | B
Thomas, von Aquin, Heiliger 1225-1274
/ Космологическое доказательство бытия Бога
/ Аристотелизм
/ Доказательство существования Бога
|
| Индексация IxTheo: | AB Философия религии NBC Бог |
| Другие ключевые слова: | B
Комментарий
|
| Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Итог: | Graham Oppy has criticized several Thomistic versions of the cosmological argument in a series of publications over the years, most recently in a Religious Studies article responding to my book Five Proofs of the Existence of God. Here I reply to his criticisms, arguing that while Oppy raises important issues, a besetting weakness of his approach is a failure adequately to grapple with the metaphysical underpinnings of the arguments. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1469-901X |
| Reference: | Kritik von "On stage one of Feser's ‘Aristotelian proof’ (2019)"
|
| Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: Religious studies
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S0034412520000384 |