Oppy on Thomistic cosmological arguments
Graham Oppy has criticized several Thomistic versions of the cosmological argument in a series of publications over the years, most recently in a Religious Studies article responding to my book Five Proofs of the Existence of God. Here I reply to his criticisms, arguing that while Oppy raises import...
| Autore principale: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo di documento: | Elettronico Articolo |
| Lingua: | Inglese |
| Verificare la disponibilità: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Caricamento...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Pubblicazione: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
2021
|
| In: |
Religious studies
Anno: 2021, Volume: 57, Fascicolo: 3, Pagine: 503-522 |
| (sequenze di) soggetti normati: | B
Thomas, von Aquin, Heiliger 1225-1274
/ Prova cosmologica dell'esistenza di Dio
/ Aristotelismo
/ Prova dell'esistenza di Dio
|
| Notazioni IxTheo: | AB Filosofia delle religioni NBC Dio |
| Altre parole chiave: | B
Commento
|
| Accesso online: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Riepilogo: | Graham Oppy has criticized several Thomistic versions of the cosmological argument in a series of publications over the years, most recently in a Religious Studies article responding to my book Five Proofs of the Existence of God. Here I reply to his criticisms, arguing that while Oppy raises important issues, a besetting weakness of his approach is a failure adequately to grapple with the metaphysical underpinnings of the arguments. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1469-901X |
| Riferimento: | Kritik von "On stage one of Feser's ‘Aristotelian proof’ (2019)"
|
| Comprende: | Enthalten in: Religious studies
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S0034412520000384 |