Oppy on Thomistic cosmological arguments
Graham Oppy has criticized several Thomistic versions of the cosmological argument in a series of publications over the years, most recently in a Religious Studies article responding to my book Five Proofs of the Existence of God. Here I reply to his criticisms, arguing that while Oppy raises import...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Electrónico Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Verificar disponibilidad: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Gargar...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publicado: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
2021
|
| En: |
Religious studies
Año: 2021, Volumen: 57, Número: 3, Páginas: 503-522 |
| (Cadenas de) Palabra clave estándar: | B
Thomas, von Aquin, Heiliger 1225-1274
/ Prueba cosmológica de la existencia de Dios
/ Aristotelismo
/ Prueba de la existencia de Dios
|
| Clasificaciones IxTheo: | AB Filosofía de la religión NBC Dios |
| Otras palabras clave: | B
Comentario
|
| Acceso en línea: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Sumario: | Graham Oppy has criticized several Thomistic versions of the cosmological argument in a series of publications over the years, most recently in a Religious Studies article responding to my book Five Proofs of the Existence of God. Here I reply to his criticisms, arguing that while Oppy raises important issues, a besetting weakness of his approach is a failure adequately to grapple with the metaphysical underpinnings of the arguments. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1469-901X |
| Reference: | Kritik von "On stage one of Feser's ‘Aristotelian proof’ (2019)"
|
| Obras secundarias: | Enthalten in: Religious studies
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S0034412520000384 |