The aloneness argument against classical theism
We argue that there is a conflict among classical theism's commitments to divine simplicity, divine creative freedom, and omniscience. We start by defining key terms for the debate related to classical theism. Then we articulate a new argument, the Aloneness Argument, aiming to establish a conf...
| Authors: | ; |
|---|---|
| Contributors: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
2021
|
| In: |
Religious studies
Year: 2022, Volume: 58, Issue: 2, Pages: 401-419 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Theism
/ Simplicity of God
/ Schöpferkraft Gottes
/ Omniscience
/ Loneliness
/ God
|
| IxTheo Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism NBC Doctrine of God |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1804275026 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240429103644.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220524s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/S0034412520000554 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1804275026 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1804275026 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1258294478 |0 (DE-627)1804282251 |4 aut |a Schmid, Joseph C. | |
| 109 | |a Schmid, Joseph C. |a Schmid, Joseph | ||
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The aloneness argument against classical theism |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a We argue that there is a conflict among classical theism's commitments to divine simplicity, divine creative freedom, and omniscience. We start by defining key terms for the debate related to classical theism. Then we articulate a new argument, the Aloneness Argument, aiming to establish a conflict among these attributes. In broad outline, the argument proceeds as follows. Under classical theism, it's possible that God exists without anything apart from Him. Any knowledge God has in such a world would be wholly intrinsic. But there are contingent truths in every world, including the world in which God exists alone. So, it's possible that God (given His omniscience) contingently has wholly intrinsic knowledge. But whatever is contingent and wholly intrinsic is an accident. So, God possibly has an accident. This is incompatible with classical theism. Finally, we consider and rebut several objections. | ||
| 601 | |a Argumentation | ||
| 652 | |a AB:NBC | ||
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4059729-5 |0 (DE-627)10614250X |0 (DE-576)209131942 |2 gnd |a Theismus |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)1073234010 |0 (DE-627)828689512 |0 (DE-576)434756660 |2 gnd |a Einfachheit Gottes |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4129252-2 |0 (DE-627)105711241 |0 (DE-576)20960901X |2 gnd |a Schöpferkraft Gottes |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4141981-9 |0 (DE-627)105616362 |0 (DE-576)209715537 |2 gnd |a Allwissenheit Gottes |
| 689 | 0 | 4 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4013921-9 |0 (DE-627)106341561 |0 (DE-576)208905995 |2 gnd |a Einsamkeit |
| 689 | 0 | 5 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4021662-7 |0 (DE-627)104649747 |0 (DE-576)208939261 |2 gnd |a Gott |
| 689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
| 700 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1080675922 |0 (DE-627)845025732 |0 (DE-576)453652662 |4 aut |a Mullins, R. T. | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Sijuwade, Joshua R. |e VerfasserIn des Bezugswerks |4 ant | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Religious studies |d Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1965 |g 58(2022), 2, Seite 401-419 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)265785405 |w (DE-600)1466479-3 |w (DE-576)079718671 |x 1469-901X |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:58 |g year:2022 |g number:2 |g pages:401-419 |
| 787 | 0 | 8 | |i Kritik in |a Sijuwade, Joshua R. |t The aloneness argument: an aspectival response |d 2022 |w (DE-627)180135121X |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412520000554 |x Resolving-System |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/religious-studies/article/aloneness-argument-against-classical-theism/95B23D5B5648C5798632351FCB2C5438 |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4139325704 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1804275026 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20230807081133 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 220524||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442042990 |a AB | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442051507 |a NBC | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a God,God,Loneliness,Loneliness,Solitude,Solitude,Omniscience,God,God,Omniscience (Theory of knowledge),Simplicity of God,God,Theism |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Dieu,Dieu,Omniscience,Omniscience,Simplicité divine,Solitude,Solitude,Théisme |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Dios,Dios,Omnisciencia,Simplicidad divina,Soledad,Soledad,Teísmo |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Dio,Dio,Onniscienza,Semplicità di Dio,Solitudine,Solitudine,Teismo |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 全知,无所不知,孤单,孤单,孤独,寂寞,孤独,寂寞,有神论,神,神,上帝,上帝 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 全知,無所不知,孤單,孤單,孤獨,寂寞,孤獨,寂寞,有神論,神,神,上帝,上帝 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Deus,Deus,Onisciência,Simplicidade divina,Solidão,Solidão,Teísmo |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Бог (мотив),Бог,Всеведение,Одиночество (мотив),Одиночество,Простота Бога,Теизм |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Απλότητα του Θεού,Θεϊσμός,Θεός (μοτίβο),Θεός,Μοναξιά (μοτίβο),Μοναξιά,Παντογνωσία |
| SUB | |a REL | ||
| SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Göttliche Einfachheit,Gott , Kraft , Allwissenheit,Göttliche Allwissenheit,Wissen Gottes , Alleinsein , Playing God |