Philip Melanchthon's Humanist Politics: Greek Scholarship in a Time of Confessional Crisis

This article examines how Philip Melanchthon utilized classical Greek texts in the confessional conflicts of the Reformation. In 1521, Melanchthon published a Greek edition of Aristophanes’ Clouds as a critique of sophistry, and in 1527 he produced a Latin translation of Demosthenes’ speeches Agains...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Publié dans:Reformation & Renaissance review
Auteur principal: Batson, Alexander (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group 2022
Dans: Reformation & Renaissance review
Sujets non-standardisés:B Philip Melanchthon
B Xenophon
B Aristophanes
B Greek
B Demosthenes
B Humanism
Accès en ligne: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Résumé:This article examines how Philip Melanchthon utilized classical Greek texts in the confessional conflicts of the Reformation. In 1521, Melanchthon published a Greek edition of Aristophanes’ Clouds as a critique of sophistry, and in 1527 he produced a Latin translation of Demosthenes’ speeches Against Aristogeiton as a rebuke of Johann Agricola's antinomianism. In the 1540s, when the Reformation came under political pressure from the Holy Roman Empire, Melanchthon used a 1540 edition of Xenophon to plead for political aid from the French crown and a 1547 edition of Demosthenes to critique Charles V's aggression. Finally, in 1548, as Melanchthon came under fire from Catholics and Gnesio-Lutherans, he turned to Athenian oratory to defend himself in the Augsburg Interim controversy. As these episodes show, Melanchthon's Greek scholarship was intimately connected with his career as a reformer, and Greek proved to be a powerful tool in addressing doctrinal controversy and political conflict.
ISSN:1743-1727
Contient:Enthalten in: Reformation & Renaissance review
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1080/14622459.2021.1999783