The Relative and Absolute Chronology of Khirbet Qeiyafa: Very Late Iron Age I or Very Early Iron Age IIA?

This article examines the suggestions by Singer-Avitz, Finkelstein and Piasetzky that Khirbet Qeiyafa belongs in the very late Iron Age I, at the end of the third quarter of the tenth century BCE. A close examination of the various arguments presented by these scholars clearly indicates methodologic...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Garfinkel, Yosef (Author) ; Kang, Hoo-Goo (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Soc. 2011
In: Israel exploration journal
Year: 2011, Volume: 61, Issue: 2, Pages: 171-183
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Non-electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1802281630
003 DE-627
005 20221214172405.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220518s2011 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)1802281630 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1802281630 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Garfinkel, Yosef  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a The Relative and Absolute Chronology of Khirbet Qeiyafa: Very Late Iron Age I or Very Early Iron Age IIA? 
264 1 |c 2011 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This article examines the suggestions by Singer-Avitz, Finkelstein and Piasetzky that Khirbet Qeiyafa belongs in the very late Iron Age I, at the end of the third quarter of the tenth century BCE. A close examination of the various arguments presented by these scholars clearly indicates methodological failures and inconsistencies that do not meet their own criteria. The pottery assemblage of Khirbet Qeiyafa is a typological 'bridge' between two periods. It maintains the Iron Age I tradition, while introducing several characteristics that later became the classical markers of the Iron Age IIA. The absolute chronology of Khirbet Qeiyafa is based upon radiometric datings of short-lived olive pits, collected from a destruction layer of a one-period site that existed for a very short time. Nothing at the site indicates a long occupation that lasted over hundreds of years. Khirbet Qeiyafa marks the beginning of a fresh cultural development, with new types of fortifications, city planning, pottery assemblage and administration. These advanced developments clearly marked the beginning of a new era — the Iron Age IIA. 
601 |a Absolution 
601 |a Chronologie 
601 |a Khirbet Qeiyafa 
700 1 |a Kang, Hoo-Goo  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Israel exploration journal  |d Jerusalem : Soc., 1950  |g 61(2011), 2, Seite 171-183  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)672808145  |w (DE-600)2638306-8  |w (DE-576)354445006  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:61  |g year:2011  |g number:2  |g pages:171-183 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Druckausgabe  |w (DE-627)1589737636  |k Non-Electronic 
856 4 0 |u https://www.jstor.org/stable/23214239  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo  |a BIIN 
951 |a AR 
BIB |a 1 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4135650473 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1802281630 
LOK |0 005 20220518052913 
LOK |0 008 220518||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-05-17#8F95B57E9EDADE308FCBC32F727C34DE2D42FEBF 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
SUB |a BIB