Procedural fairness for radiotherapy priority setting in a low resource context
Radiotherapy is an essential component of cancer treatment, yet many countries do not have adequate capacity to serve their populations. This mismatch between demand and supply creates the need for priority setting. There is no widely accepted system to guide patient prioritization for radiotherapy...
| VerfasserInnen: | ; ; ; ; ; ; ; |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Lade...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Wiley-Blackwell
2022
|
| In: |
Bioethics
Jahr: 2022, Band: 36, Heft: 5, Seiten: 500-510 |
| IxTheo Notationen: | NCC Sozialethik NCH Medizinische Ethik |
| weitere Schlagwörter: | B
global health
B Resource Allocation B Rwanda B Radiotherapy B accountability for reasonableness B priority setting |
| Online Zugang: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1802263535 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220610102714.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220518s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/bioe.12939 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1802263535 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1802263535 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a DeBoer, Rebecca J. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Procedural fairness for radiotherapy priority setting in a low resource context |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Radiotherapy is an essential component of cancer treatment, yet many countries do not have adequate capacity to serve their populations. This mismatch between demand and supply creates the need for priority setting. There is no widely accepted system to guide patient prioritization for radiotherapy in a low resource context. In the absence of consensus on allocation principles, fair procedures for priority setting should be established. Research is needed to understand what elements of procedural fairness are important to decision makers in diverse settings, assess the feasibility of implementing fair procedures for priority setting in low resource contexts, and improve these processes. This study presents the views of decision makers engaged in everyday radiotherapy priority setting at a cancer center in Rwanda. Semi-structured interviews with 22 oncology physicians, nurses, program leaders, and advisors were conducted. Participants evaluated actual radiotherapy priority setting procedures at the program (meso) and patient (micro) levels, reporting facilitators, barriers, and recommendations. We discuss our findings in relation to the leading Accountability for Reasonableness (AFR) framework. Participants emphasized procedural elements that facilitate adherence to normative principles, such as objective criteria that maximize lives saved. They ascribed fairness to AFR's substantive requirement of relevance more than transparency, appeals, and enforcement. They identified several challenges unresolved by AFR, such as conflicting relevant rationales and unintended consequences of publicity and appeals. Implementing fair procedure itself is resource intensive, a paradox that calls for innovative, context-appropriate solutions. Finally, socioeconomic and structural barriers to care that undermine procedural fairness must be addressed. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Rwanda | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Resource Allocation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Radiotherapy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a priority setting | |
| 650 | 4 | |a global health | |
| 650 | 4 | |a accountability for reasonableness | |
| 652 | |a NCC:NCH | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Nguyen, Cam |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Mutoniwase, Espérance |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ho, Anita |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Umutesi, Grace |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Bigirimana, Jean Bosco |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Triedman, Scott A. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Shyirambere, Cyprien |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Bioethics |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1987 |g 36(2022), 5, Seite 500-510 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)271596708 |w (DE-600)1480658-7 |w (DE-576)078707986 |x 1467-8519 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:36 |g year:2022 |g number:5 |g pages:500-510 |
| 856 | |u https://escholarship.org/content/qt2kr7626t/qt2kr7626t.pdf?t=rwzi45 |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH title and first author match)] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12939 |x Resolving-System |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bioe.12939 |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4135628958 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1802263535 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20220610102714 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 220518||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-05-17#F53A55EFFF7542028C51EBD2D52347BBE8ECB2AD | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a zota | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 144205283X |a NCC | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1550736558 |a NCH | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||