The Sadducees and the Water Libation

The consensus of scholarship believes that the Sadducees rejected the legitimacy of the Sukkot water libations. This conclusion is based on two principal arguments. The first argument rests on rabbinic traditions which supposedly state that the Sadducees opposed the libation. The second argument is...

Descrizione completa

Salvato in:  
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autore principale: Rubenstein, Jeffrey (Autore)
Tipo di documento: Elettronico Articolo
Lingua:Inglese
Verificare la disponibilità: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Pubblicazione: 1994
In: The Jewish quarterly review
Anno: 1994, Volume: 84, Fascicolo: 4, Pagine: 417-444
Accesso online: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1802086463
003 DE-627
005 20220517053716.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220517s1994 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.2307/1455084  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1802086463 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1802086463 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Rubenstein, Jeffrey  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a The Sadducees and the Water Libation 
264 1 |c 1994 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The consensus of scholarship believes that the Sadducees rejected the legitimacy of the Sukkot water libations. This conclusion is based on two principal arguments. The first argument rests on rabbinic traditions which supposedly state that the Sadducees opposed the libation. The second argument is based on the assumption that the Sadducees rejected "the Oral Law" which provided the authority for the ritual. Neither of these arguments stands up to criticism. Rabbinic sources nowhere state that the Sadducees rejected the libation. New evidence from Qumran, together with more methodologically aware analyses of rabbinic texts, have revised the general conception of the Sadducees and their approach to law. The libation controversy must therefore be explained on other grounds. Two possible explanations are proposed. The controversy may have derived from a dispute concerning the place upon the altar where libations should be poured. It is also possible that the controversy centered on the legitimacy of bringing the water libations on the Sabbath and not on the legitimacy of the libation per se. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t The Jewish quarterly review  |d Philadelphia, Pa. : Penn Press, 1888  |g 84(1994), 4, Seite 417-444  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)369554582  |w (DE-600)2119232-7  |w (DE-576)121599566  |x 1553-0604  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:84  |g year:1994  |g number:4  |g pages:417-444 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.2307/1455084  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.jstor.org/stable/1455084  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4134988462 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1802086463 
LOK |0 005 20220517053716 
LOK |0 008 220517||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-05-04#9301CC5BAEECF6915FE8D1912FBF7489A30087BC 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw