Collegial Interaction in the Babylonian Talmud

Contemporary amoraim frequently interacted with one another. Their interactions as recorded in the Babylonian Talmud are not the product of the talmudic editors but are "real," i.e., historical. Frequently the masters were not just contemporaries but also colleagues, that is, teachers of s...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kalmin, Richard (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Penn Press 1992
In: The Jewish quarterly review
Year: 1992, Volume: 82, Issue: 3/4, Pages: 383-415
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1802085068
003 DE-627
005 20220517053711.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220517s1992 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.2307/1454864  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1802085068 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1802085068 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Kalmin, Richard  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Collegial Interaction in the Babylonian Talmud 
264 1 |c 1992 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Contemporary amoraim frequently interacted with one another. Their interactions as recorded in the Babylonian Talmud are not the product of the talmudic editors but are "real," i.e., historical. Frequently the masters were not just contemporaries but also colleagues, that is, teachers of students. Collegial interactions were frequently formal (not by chance, not episodic) and hierarchical (with a clear sense of inferior/superior, not a relationship between equals). The judicial and rabbinic hierarchies were distinct in the first two amoraic generations but were unified in the third and following generations. Again, the talmudic portrayal accurately reflects historical reality, or at least a change in perception on the part of the rabbis, and is not an invention by late pseudepigraphers. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t The Jewish quarterly review  |d Philadelphia, Pa. : Penn Press, 1888  |g 82(1992), 3/4, Seite 383-415  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)369554582  |w (DE-600)2119232-7  |w (DE-576)121599566  |x 1553-0604  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:82  |g year:1992  |g number:3/4  |g pages:383-415 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.2307/1454864  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.jstor.org/stable/1454864  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4134987067 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1802085068 
LOK |0 005 20220517053711 
LOK |0 008 220517||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-05-04#2092A8BC3E602AA3031E86CA9D593A0C4A4719C0 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw