Using Attribution Theory to Help Frame Moral Dilemmas: An Empirical Test of the President Clinton – Monica Lewinski Case
This study extends theapplication of attribution theory to analyzemoral dilemmas. Kelley's model of causalattribution is proposed as a pedagogical toolin helping students organize and evaluatecomplex moral dilemmas while avoiding commonperception errors. By posing three questions,students are c...
Главные авторы: | ; |
---|---|
Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
Язык: | Английский |
Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
Опубликовано: |
2003
|
В: |
Teaching business ethics
Год: 2003, Том: 7, Выпуск: 2, Страницы: 123-137 |
Другие ключевые слова: | B
Attribution Theory
B perception error B Organizational Behavior B Moral Judgment |
Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Итог: | This study extends theapplication of attribution theory to analyzemoral dilemmas. Kelley's model of causalattribution is proposed as a pedagogical toolin helping students organize and evaluatecomplex moral dilemmas while avoiding commonperception errors. By posing three questions,students are challenged to identify patternsand context of behaviors that help arrive atthe source cause(s) of those behaviors. To testthe usefulness of Kelley's model in analyzingmoral dilemmas, the President Clinton – MonicaLewinski case is empirically tested. Resultssupport the usefulness of Kelly's model ofcausal attribution as a valid and useful toolfor students in framing complex moral dilemmasand avoiding common perception and attributionerrors. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1573-1944 |
Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: Teaching business ethics
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1023/A:1022637518414 |