„Świadectwo” (‘ēdût) w kapłańskiej koncepcji sanktuarium i przymierza

The theological meaning of the word ‘ēdût, which is used in the priestly narrative about the construction of the Tent of Meeting, has long been a topic of debate. A synchronic analysis allows us to see in it “two stone tablets”, a kind of artifact which Moses puts into the Ark and which is not to be...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lemański, Janusz (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:Polish
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: CEEOL 2015
In: Verbum vitae
Year: 2015, Volume: 27, Pages: 47-76
Further subjects:B teologia kapłańska
B Arka Przymierza
B przymierze
B świadectwo
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1801581983
003 DE-627
005 20221214175051.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220512s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||pol c
024 7 |a 10.31743/vv.1604  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1801581983 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1801581983 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a pol 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Lemański, Janusz  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a „Świadectwo” (‘ēdût) w kapłańskiej koncepcji sanktuarium i przymierza 
264 1 |c 2015 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The theological meaning of the word ‘ēdût, which is used in the priestly narrative about the construction of the Tent of Meeting, has long been a topic of debate. A synchronic analysis allows us to see in it “two stone tablets”, a kind of artifact which Moses puts into the Ark and which is not to be seen again. It symbolizes and brings to mind all the words of God passed on by Moses at Sinai. On other hand, diachronic analysis allows us to think that the idea of the Ark did not belong to the priestly strata of PG but rather was added later (PS). It has also been suggested that in P originally the Ark was called the Ark of Meeting and then the Ark of Testimony (the connection between j‘d and ‘dwt → ‘d). In its original form, the narrative about the Ark might have suggested the traditional role of the object: it symbolized the presence of God and was understood as the footstool of His invisible throne, where the treaty was kept. Later, the concept of the place of meeting with God was transferred to the Ark-cover (kappōret), and ‘ēdût (Testimony) became the symbol of the covenant stipulations. In the final phase it came to mean the two stone tablets with the Decalogue. 
650 4 |a teologia kapłańska 
650 4 |a Arka Przymierza 
650 4 |a przymierze 
650 4 |a świadectwo 
650 4 |a teologia kapłańska 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Verbum vitae  |d Lublin : CEEOL, 2002  |g 27(2015), Seite 47-76  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)688079121  |w (DE-600)2653044-2  |w (DE-576)360556159  |x 2451-280X  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:27  |g year:2015  |g pages:47-76 
856 |u https://czasopisma.kul.pl/index.php/vv/article/download/1604/1570  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [oa journal (via doaj)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.31743/vv.1604  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://czasopisma.kul.pl/index.php/vv/article/view/1604  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo  |a BIIN 
936 u w |d 27  |j 2015  |h 47-76 
951 |a AR 
BIB |a 1 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4132884473 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1801581983 
LOK |0 005 20220512053109 
LOK |0 008 220512||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-04-20#A49643430783F383EA409157870C154F9E6FABEC 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
SUB |a BIB