Notes on the Use of the Sign URBS (L.225) in Anatolian Hieroglyphic

This article discusses the use of the sign <URBS> (L.225) in Anatolian Hieroglyphic. In particular, it analyzes the attestations and contexts of use of the sign employed in combination with <mi> (L.391) (§ 2). It is well-known that the self-standing sign <URBS> was used as a determ...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Trameri, Andrea (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:German
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: De Gruyter 2019
In: Altorientalische Forschungen
Year: 2019, Volume: 46, Issue: 2, Pages: 249-269
Further subjects:B determinative
B City
B Anatolian Hieroglyphic
B Mursili
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 180147589X
003 DE-627
005 20220512052811.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220512s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||ger c
024 7 |a 10.1515/aofo-2019-0017  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)180147589X 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP180147589X 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a ger 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Trameri, Andrea  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Trameri, Andrea 
245 1 0 |a Notes on the Use of the Sign URBS (L.225) in Anatolian Hieroglyphic 
264 1 |c 2019 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This article discusses the use of the sign <URBS> (L.225) in Anatolian Hieroglyphic. In particular, it analyzes the attestations and contexts of use of the sign employed in combination with <mi> (L.391) (§ 2). It is well-known that the self-standing sign <URBS> was used as a determinative for city names, while the form with ligature + MI was employed as a logogram. A systematic analysis of the Anatolian Hieroglyphic corpus shows that this convention was very consistent. This article provides an updated corpus of attestations of the logographic usage; it is also shown that a less common form of this sign combination, without ligature (<URBS- MI >), was an alternative logographic writing in the early stage of the script, but the form with ligature (<URBS+ MI >) became the standard after the 12 th century. Possible exceptions to this convention and other inconsistent or problematic uses are discussed (§ 3). Conclusions include some considerations on the possible phonetic quality of the ligature + MI, and on the form of the Luwian word for “city” (§ 4). The final section discusses the use of the sign <URBS> in the spelling of the name Mursili, in light of the present analysis (§ 5). 
650 4 |a Mursili 
650 4 |a determinative 
650 4 |a City 
650 4 |a Anatolian Hieroglyphic 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Altorientalische Forschungen  |d Berlin : De Gruyter, 1974  |g 46(2019), 2, Seite 249-269  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)566014262  |w (DE-600)2425759-X  |w (DE-576)283407646  |x 2196-6761  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:46  |g year:2019  |g number:2  |g pages:249-269 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1515/aofo-2019-0017  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/aofo-2019-0017/html  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4132778363 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 180147589X 
LOK |0 005 20220512052811 
LOK |0 008 220512||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-04-19#1C95B3DE0A073D0EC46C0A430D176EDB2213F93A 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
STA 0 0 |a City 
STB 0 0 |a City,Centre ville,Centre ville 
STC 0 0 |a Centro de la ciudad 
STD 0 0 |a City 
STG 0 0 |a Centro da cidade 
STH 0 0 |a Сити,Центр города 
STI 0 0 |a Κέντρο πόλης 
SYE 0 0 |a Downtown