A Diachronic Consistency Argument for Minimizing One’s Own Rights Violations

Deontologists are united in asserting that there are side-constraints on permissible action, prohibiting acts of murder, theft, infidelity, etc., even in cases where performing such acts would make things better overall from an impartial standpoint. These constraints are enshrined in the vocabulary...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Côté, Nicolas (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Science + Business Media B. V 2021
In: Ethical theory and moral practice
Year: 2021, Volume: 24, Issue: 5, Pages: 1109-1121
Further subjects:B Rights
B Rational choice
B Diachronic consistency
B Paradox of deontology
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1800785399
003 DE-627
005 20220503155303.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220503s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s10677-021-10253-w  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1800785399 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1800785399 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Côté, Nicolas  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 2 |a A Diachronic Consistency Argument for Minimizing One’s Own Rights Violations 
264 1 |c 2021 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Deontologists are united in asserting that there are side-constraints on permissible action, prohibiting acts of murder, theft, infidelity, etc., even in cases where performing such acts would make things better overall from an impartial standpoint. These constraints are enshrined in the vocabulary of rights apply even when violating those constraints would lead to fewer constraint-violations overall: I am prohibited from killing an innocent even when doing so is the only way to prevent you from killing five. However, deontologists are divided over whether we have a duty to violate a smaller number of rights when this is necessary to prevent ourselves from later violating a larger number of rights that are at least as stringent. I argue that individuals do have such a duty, a duty which follows from widely accepted consistency constraints on choice. 
601 |a Diachronie 
601 |a Argumentation 
650 4 |a Diachronic consistency 
650 4 |a Paradox of deontology 
650 4 |a Rational Choice 
650 4 |a Rights 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Ethical theory and moral practice  |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1998  |g 24(2021), 5, Seite 1109-1121  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320527093  |w (DE-600)2015306-5  |w (DE-576)104558555  |x 1572-8447  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:24  |g year:2021  |g number:5  |g pages:1109-1121 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-021-10253-w  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 24  |j 2021  |e 5  |h 1109-1121 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4128825212 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1800785399 
LOK |0 005 20220503152715 
LOK |0 008 220503||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
STA 0 0 |a Rational choice 
STB 0 0 |a Théorie du choix rationnel 
STC 0 0 |a Elección racional 
STD 0 0 |a Scelta razionale,Teoria della scelta razionale,Teoria della scelta razionale 
STE 0 0 |a 理性选择,理性决择 
STF 0 0 |a 理性選擇,理性決擇 
STG 0 0 |a Escolha racional 
STH 0 0 |a Теория рационального выбора 
STI 0 0 |a Ορθολογική επιλογή,Θεωρία της ορθολογικής επιλογής 
SYE 0 0 |a Rational-Choice-Ansatz,Rational-Choice-Theorie,Rationales Handeln,Rationale Entscheidung,Werterwartungstheorie