Is Aristotelian Naturalism Safe From the Moral Outsider?
Scott Woodcock has levied a number of objections against Aristotelian naturalism which claims that ethical norms are grounded by reason and biology. His most recent "membership objection" is a synthesis of earlier objections and consists in a trilemma. If Aristotelian naturalists answer th...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
2021
|
In: |
Ethical theory and moral practice
Year: 2021, Volume: 24, Issue: 5, Pages: 1123-1137 |
Further subjects: | B
Aristotelian naturalism
B Indeterminacy objection B Membership objection B Pollyanna Problem B MacIntyre B Rationality of traditions |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1800785291 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20220503155329.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 220503s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10677-021-10250-z |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1800785291 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1800785291 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a McCracken, Gennady |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Is Aristotelian Naturalism Safe From the Moral Outsider? |
264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Scott Woodcock has levied a number of objections against Aristotelian naturalism which claims that ethical norms are grounded by reason and biology. His most recent "membership objection" is a synthesis of earlier objections and consists in a trilemma. If Aristotelian naturalists answer the first horn of the trilemma by stipulating that determinations of species-membership are grounded non-empirically, and the second horn of the trilemma by stipulating rationality is species-specific, then they are confronted by a moral outsider—someone who claims that they have non-empirically determined their species membership and are thus guided by different norms of rationality than the rest of us. This permits the moral outsider to act heinously without moral sanction from Aristotelian naturalism. Critics have neglected Alasdair MacIntyre’s Aristotelian naturalism. And he has faced moral-outsider-type counterexamples before. I develop a new response to counterexamples MacIntyre’s account has faced and argue that MacIntyre’s Aristotelian naturalism is able to answer Woodcock’s membership objection. I do this by developing an empirical taxonomy-based approach that enables us to justify the moral outsider’s responsibilities while preserving the best of Aristotelian naturalism. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Aristotelian naturalism | |
650 | 4 | |a Indeterminacy objection | |
650 | 4 | |a MacIntyre | |
650 | 4 | |a Membership objection | |
650 | 4 | |a Pollyanna Problem | |
650 | 4 | |a Rationality of traditions | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Ethical theory and moral practice |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1998 |g 24(2021), 5, Seite 1123-1137 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320527093 |w (DE-600)2015306-5 |w (DE-576)104558555 |x 1572-8447 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:24 |g year:2021 |g number:5 |g pages:1123-1137 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-021-10250-z |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4128825050 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1800785291 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20220503152634 | ||
LOK | |0 008 220503||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw |