On the Harm of Imposing Risk of Harm
What is wrong with imposing pure risks, that is, risks that don’t materialize into harm? According to a popular response, imposing pure risks is pro tanto wrong, when and because risk itself is harmful. Call this the Harm View. Defenders of this view make one of the following two claims. On the Cons...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
2021
|
In: |
Ethical theory and moral practice
Year: 2021, Volume: 24, Issue: 4, Pages: 965-980 |
Further subjects: | B
Harm View
B Preference B Risk B Autonomy B Wrong-makers |
Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 180065815X | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240416193407.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 220502s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10677-021-10227-y |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)180065815X | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP180065815X | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Maheshwari, Kritika |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a On the Harm of Imposing Risk of Harm |
264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a What is wrong with imposing pure risks, that is, risks that don’t materialize into harm? According to a popular response, imposing pure risks is pro tanto wrong, when and because risk itself is harmful. Call this the Harm View. Defenders of this view make one of the following two claims. On the Constitutive Claim, pure risk imposition is pro tanto wrong when and because risk constitutes diminishing one’s well-being viz. preference-frustration or setting-back their legitimate interest in autonomy. On the Contingent Claim, pure risk imposition is pro tanto wrong when and because risk has harmful consequences for the risk-bearers, such as psychological distress. This paper argues that the Harm View is plausible only on the Contingent Claim, but fails on the Constitutive Claim. In discussing the latter, I argue that both the preference and autonomy account fail to show that risk itself is constitutively harmful and thereby wrong. In discussing the former, I argue that risk itself is contingently harmful and thereby wrong but only in a narrow range of cases. I conclude that while the Harm View can sometimes explain the wrong of imposing risk when (and because) risk itself is contingently harmful, it is unsuccessful as a general, exhaustive account of what makes pure imposition wrong. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Autonomy | |
650 | 4 | |a Harm View | |
650 | 4 | |a Preference | |
650 | 4 | |a Risk | |
650 | 4 | |a Wrong-makers | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Ethical theory and moral practice |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1998 |g 24(2021), 4, Seite 965-980 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320527093 |w (DE-600)2015306-5 |w (DE-576)104558555 |x 1572-8447 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:24 |g year:2021 |g number:4 |g pages:965-980 |
856 | |u https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10677-021-10227-y.pdf |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [open (via crossref license)] | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-021-10227-y |x Resolving-System |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4128108154 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 180065815X | ||
LOK | |0 005 20220502144644 | ||
LOK | |0 008 220502||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
OAS | |a 1 | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw |