Hearing Voices, Interpreting Words
In this commentary I will be exploring a number of implications that McCauley and Graham’s theses about the interrelationship of normal, religious, and mentally disordered cognition have for an interpretative methodology that has been fruitfully utilized by empirically-oriented scholars of religion....
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Review |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Equinox Publ.
2021
|
| Dans: |
Journal for the cognitive science of religion
Année: 2019, Volume: 7, Numéro: 1, Pages: 9-20 |
| Compte rendu de: | Hearing voices and other matters of the mind (New York, NY : Oxford University Press, 2020) (Gardiner, Mark Q.)
|
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Expérience religieuse
/ Trouble psychique
/ Méthodologie
/ Kognitive Religionswissenschaft
|
| Classifications IxTheo: | AA Sciences des religions AE Psychologie de la religion |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Compte-rendu de lecture
B Interprétation B Religion B Cognition B Behavior B Mental Disorder |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Résumé: | In this commentary I will be exploring a number of implications that McCauley and Graham’s theses about the interrelationship of normal, religious, and mentally disordered cognition have for an interpretative methodology that has been fruitfully utilized by empirically-oriented scholars of religion. I argue that that methodology imposes some important constraints on the type of theorizing McCauley and Graham propose, and that their findings in turn suggest some important modifications to that methodology. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2049-7563 |
| Référence: | Kritik in "Gods in Disorder (2021)"
|
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Journal for the cognitive science of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1558/jcsr.19502 |