Divine Simplicity, God’s Freedom, and the Supposed Problem of Modal Collapse

Proponents of the modal collapse argument claim that divine simplicity, traditionally conceived, contradicts other Christian commitments about divine freedom and grace by ultimately rendering all God’s acts, including creation and redemption, absolutely necessary. If true, the argument goes, theolog...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Pedersen, Daniel James 1986- (Author) ; Lilley, Christopher (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill 2022
In: Journal of reformed theology
Year: 2022, Volume: 16, Issue: 1/2, Pages: 127-147
IxTheo Classification:NBC Doctrine of God
Further subjects:B modal collapse
B Necessity
B Freedom
B Simplicity
B God
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1798307456
003 DE-627
005 20230421183246.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220409s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1163/15697312-bja10028  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1798307456 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1798307456 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1062521633  |0 (DE-627)805363467  |0 (DE-576)419108696  |4 aut  |a Pedersen, Daniel James  |d 1986- 
109 |a Pedersen, Daniel James 1986-  |a Pedersen, Daniel J. 1986-  |a Pedersen, Daniel 1986- 
245 1 0 |a Divine Simplicity, God’s Freedom, and the Supposed Problem of Modal Collapse 
264 1 |c 2022 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Proponents of the modal collapse argument claim that divine simplicity, traditionally conceived, contradicts other Christian commitments about divine freedom and grace by ultimately rendering all God’s acts, including creation and redemption, absolutely necessary. If true, the argument goes, theologians must abandon either God’s simplicity or God’s freedom. The aim of this dilemma is to force the abandonment of simplicity. However, we argue that the modal collapse argument is insufficient to generate this dilemma apart from additional premises—and that these tacit premises are the true locus of dispute. 
601 |a Problem 
650 4 |a modal collapse 
650 4 |a Freedom 
650 4 |a Necessity 
650 4 |a Simplicity 
650 4 |a God 
652 |a NBC 
700 1 |a Lilley, Christopher  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of reformed theology  |d Leiden : Brill, 2007  |g 16(2022), 1/2, Seite 127-147  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)529765632  |w (DE-600)2316050-0  |w (DE-576)306834308  |x 1569-7312  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:16  |g year:2022  |g number:1/2  |g pages:127-147 
856 |u https://brill.com/downloadpdf/journals/jrt/16/1-2/article-p127_8.pdf  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [open (via page says license)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1163/15697312-bja10028  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://brill.com/view/journals/jrt/16/1-2/article-p127_8.xml  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4114336974 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1798307456 
LOK |0 005 20230421183246 
LOK |0 008 220409||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-04-08#9B830710F43E78B000FE30CF2A14DA26BEACBD12 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a zota 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442051507  |a NBC 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw