On Periphrastic Genitive Constructions in Biblical Hebrew

J. M. Allegro has convincingly shown that the archaic Hebrew relative pronoun הֶז can function as a genitive marker in a common Semitic pattern Noun Pronoun Noun (cf. Aramaic baytā dī-malkā). So far, it has been assumed that once הֶז was replaced by ֲאֶֹשר this pattern was no longer possible in Hebr...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Pat-El, Na’ama (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: The National Association of Professors of Hebrew 2010
In: Hebrew studies
Year: 2010, Volume: 51, Issue: 1, Pages: 43-48
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1798051613
003 DE-627
005 20221215202721.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220407s2010 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)1798051613 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1798051613 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Pat-El, Na’ama  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a On Periphrastic Genitive Constructions in Biblical Hebrew 
264 1 |c 2010 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a J. M. Allegro has convincingly shown that the archaic Hebrew relative pronoun הֶז can function as a genitive marker in a common Semitic pattern Noun Pronoun Noun (cf. Aramaic baytā dī-malkā). So far, it has been assumed that once הֶז was replaced by ֲאֶֹשר this pattern was no longer possible in Hebrew. The current paper offers data which indicate that at least in Biblical Hebrew ֲאֶֹשר can still function as a genitive marker. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Hebrew studies  |d Austin, TX : The National Association of Professors of Hebrew, 1976  |g 51(2010), 1, Seite 43-48  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)644059591  |w (DE-600)2589647-7  |w (DE-576)38159808X  |x 2158-1681  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:51  |g year:2010  |g number:1  |g pages:43-48 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/27913962  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://muse.jhu.edu/article/400576  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo  |a BIIN 
936 u w |d 51  |j 2010  |e 1  |h 43-48 
951 |a AR 
BIB |a 1 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4112933533 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1798051613 
LOK |0 005 20220407053648 
LOK |0 008 220407||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-03-29#A1C665CC47FE17A94BA0C50E24D7B592FB10BE4F 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/27913962 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
SUB |a BIB