Origen, Plato, and Conscience (Synderesis) in Jerome's Ezekiel Commentary

Due especially to the pioneering work of Lottin, philosophers and theologians interested in the medieval discussion of the human conscience are today well aware that the Scholastic debate was framed principally in relation to two words, conscientia and synderesis. In the now classic formulation of t...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kries, Douglas (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge University Press 2002
In: Traditio
Year: 2002, Volume: 57, Pages: 67-83
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1798039737
003 DE-627
005 20220407053607.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220407s2002 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1017/S0362152900002701  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1798039737 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1798039737 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Kries, Douglas  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Origen, Plato, and Conscience (Synderesis) in Jerome's Ezekiel Commentary 
264 1 |c 2002 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Due especially to the pioneering work of Lottin, philosophers and theologians interested in the medieval discussion of the human conscience are today well aware that the Scholastic debate was framed principally in relation to two words, conscientia and synderesis. In the now classic formulation of the distinction between those two terms by Thomas Aquinas, synderesis is understood as the special habitus of the practical intellect whereby human beings know the basic principles of morality, whereas conscientia is the act whereby the practical reasoning powers of a human being apply the fundamental principles to the particular matter at hand. It is also generally acknowledged by scholars today that the argument about the relationship between conscientia and synderesis began many years prior to Thomas's work, that the medieval debate was originally spurred by the introduction of the strange term synderesis into the conversation, and that the term entered the discussion by means of an enigmatic passage in Jerome's Commentary on Ezekiel. Finally, most scholars acknowledge that the appearance of synderesis in the medieval manuscripts of Jerome's commentary is in all likelihood a corruption of the Greek word syneidēsis, which is the standard correlate in Greek Patristic literature for the Latin conscientia. 
601 |a conscience 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Traditio  |d Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1943  |g 57(2002), Seite 67-83  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)625423445  |w (DE-600)2551239-0  |w (DE-576)326863265  |x 2166-5508  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:57  |g year:2002  |g pages:67-83 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/27832010  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0362152900002701  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/traditio/article/origen-plato-and-conscience-synderesis-in-jeromes-ezekiel-commentary/6491C00BC1CBB55FC1275C2CC846A35D  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4112921454 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1798039737 
LOK |0 005 20220407053607 
LOK |0 008 220407||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-03-29#68CA9D7857A6B47C3AE238028136EC9E21665F06 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/27832010 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw