‘Amor and His Brother Cupid’: The ‘Two Loves’ in Heinrich von Veldeke's ‘Eneit’

Most scholars who have studied the medieval adaptations of Virgil's epic masterpiece agree that the principal change introduced to the story by the Roman d'Eneas and Heinrich von Veldeke's Eneit involves the Dido and Lavinia episodes. In general terms, the first four books of the Aene...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Groos, Arthur (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge University Press 1976
In: Traditio
Year: 1976, Volume: 32, Issue: 1, Pages: 239-255
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1798036304
003 DE-627
005 20220407053552.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220407s1976 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1017/S0362152900005523  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1798036304 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1798036304 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Groos, Arthur  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a ‘Amor and His Brother Cupid’: The ‘Two Loves’ in Heinrich von Veldeke's ‘Eneit’ 
264 1 |c 1976 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Most scholars who have studied the medieval adaptations of Virgil's epic masterpiece agree that the principal change introduced to the story by the Roman d'Eneas and Heinrich von Veldeke's Eneit involves the Dido and Lavinia episodes. In general terms, the first four books of the Aeneid have been reduced in scope to the story of Dido, whereas Virgil's brief references to Lavinia in later books have been expanded into an independent love intrigue several thousand lines in length, creating a bipartite epic which anticipates the structure of Arthurian romance. There is considerably less unanimity of opinion concerning the nature and function of these two episodes in Veldeke's Eneit. The argument has circled for the most part around the question whether the loves of Dido and Lavinia for Eneas can be differentiated in terms of ‘unrehte’ and ‘rehte minne’ or in terms of fate and external circumstances. The following study focuses on a basic element of the work which has largely been ignored but could clarify the dispute: the distribution and roles of the gods of love in the two episodes. 
601 |a Heinrich von Veldeke 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Traditio  |d Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1943  |g 32(1976), 1, Seite 239-255  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)625423445  |w (DE-600)2551239-0  |w (DE-576)326863265  |x 2166-5508  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:32  |g year:1976  |g number:1  |g pages:239-255 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0362152900005523  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/traditio/article/abs/amor-and-his-brother-cupid-the-two-loves-in-heinrich-von-veldekes-eneit/774C9084F66CB06B35DD8DC72FA00D70  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4112917945 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1798036304 
LOK |0 005 20220407053552 
LOK |0 008 220407||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-03-29#8E8BB1326C866CE56F88250C88FAC7A8D2FF8A68 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw