Archaeology's Publication Problems by J. Aviram and H. Shanks

Lamentations over the condition of archaeological publication abound these days. A recent volume of essays-of distinguished provenance-rounds up the usual suspects. Yet a fundamental point is altogether missing from its discussion. What archaeologists observe and can readily document is emplacement,...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Buccellati, Giorgio (Author)
Format: Electronic Review
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: University of Chicago Press 1998
In: Near Eastern archaeology
Year: 1998, Volume: 61, Issue: 2, Pages: 118-120
Further subjects:B Book review
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:Lamentations over the condition of archaeological publication abound these days. A recent volume of essays-of distinguished provenance-rounds up the usual suspects. Yet a fundamental point is altogether missing from its discussion. What archaeologists observe and can readily document is emplacement, i.e., the cultural remains they identify in the ground. What retards publication is concentration on the depositional inferences from this record. Focusing on emplacement would both speed publication and enforce a truly essential methodological distinction.
ISSN:2325-5404
Contains:Enthalten in: Near Eastern archaeology
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.2307/3210641