Reception of the Twelve in Matthew and Luke: Comparing the Current Synoptic Hypotheses
On the Markan priority, the portrayal and development of the Twelve belong to the most iconic improvements of Matthew and Luke over Mark’s gospel. Going back to the 19th century, proponents of Matthew’s and Luke’s independence have pointed out Luke’s non-use of Matthean additions to Mark, including...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Sage
2022
|
In: |
The expository times
Year: 2022, Volume: 133, Issue: 6, Pages: 233-244 |
Further subjects: | B
Matthean Posteriority Hypothesis
B Farrer Hypothesis B Synoptic Problem B Two-Document Hypothesis B Matthew B Peter B The Twelve |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 179695425X | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20220331000234.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 220330s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1177/00145246221074815 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)179695425X | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP179695425X | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1200057120 |0 (DE-627)1682253953 |4 aut |a Andrejevs, Olegs |d 1982- | |
109 | |a Andrejevs, Olegs 1982- | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Reception of the Twelve in Matthew and Luke: Comparing the Current Synoptic Hypotheses |
264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a On the Markan priority, the portrayal and development of the Twelve belong to the most iconic improvements of Matthew and Luke over Mark’s gospel. Going back to the 19th century, proponents of Matthew’s and Luke’s independence have pointed out Luke’s non-use of Matthean additions to Mark, including such passages as Matthew 9:9; 14:28-31; 16:17-19; 17:24-27. In recent decades, defenders of the Farrer hypothesis (Luke’s use of Matthew) have attempted to explain Luke’s failure to take over Matthew’s changes of Mark in these instances with a range of proposals. This article takes up the debate, responding to the arguments of the Farrer scholars and engaging the recently resurgent Matthean Posteriority hypothesis (Matthew’s use of Luke) which, it will be suggested, faces a similar set of issues. | ||
601 | |a Hypothese | ||
650 | 4 | |a Matthew | |
650 | 4 | |a Peter | |
650 | 4 | |a The Twelve | |
650 | 4 | |a Two-Document Hypothesis | |
650 | 4 | |a Matthean Posteriority Hypothesis | |
650 | 4 | |a Farrer Hypothesis | |
650 | 4 | |a Synoptic Problem | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t The expository times |d London : Sage, 1889 |g 133(2022), 6, Seite 233-244 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)368316432 |w (DE-600)2117688-7 |w (DE-576)119460661 |x 1745-5308 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:133 |g year:2022 |g number:6 |g pages:233-244 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1177/00145246221074815 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4106750635 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 179695425X | ||
LOK | |0 005 20220330052548 | ||
LOK | |0 008 220330||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-03-29#36356A5E4009FCA557B783F83E905EBBCED01030 | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a zota | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
SYE | 0 | 0 | |a Peters, ... , Peter des Roches,Peter,Petrus,Peter,Peter,Peter,Pierre,Alençon, Pierre d',Peter,Peter,Peter,Peter,Peter,Petr Alekseevič,Pjotr Alexejewitsch,Pjotr Alexejewitsch,Pjotr,Petr,Petro,Negoš, Petr Petrović,Gniegosc, Pietro P.,Petar,Petar,Njegoš, Petar Petrović,Petrović Njegoš, Petar,Peter,Peter,Peter,Peter,Petrus,Petrus,Petrus,Aliaco, Peter de,Eliaco, Petro de,Aliaco, Petrus d',Eliaco, Petrus d',Ailly, Pierre de,Peter of Ailly,Petrus de Alliaco,Petrus de Alliaco,Petrus episcopus Cameracensis,Pierre d' Ailly,Pierre d'Ailly,Pierre d'Ailly,Ailly, Peter von,Alliaco, Petrus de,Ailly, Pierre d',Peter,Petar,Mrkonjić, Petar |