Evil and maximal greatness
By defining God as a maximally great being Plantinga is able to devise an ontological argument which validly infers from the possibility of there being a God that there necessarily is a God. In this article I shall argue that Plantinga’s argument is not only question-begging, as several critics have...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Recurso Electrónico Artigo |
| Idioma: | Inglês |
| Verificar disponibilidade: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Carregar...
|
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Publicado em: |
2022
|
| Em: |
International journal for philosophy of religion
Ano: 2022, Volume: 91, Número: 2, Páginas: 93-109 |
| (Cadeias de) Palavra- chave padrão: | B
Plantinga, Alvin 1932-
/ Prova ontológica da existência de Deus
/ Modalidade
/ Tamanho
/ Maximum
/ Crítica
/ O mal
/ Círculo vicioso (Filosofia)
|
| Classificações IxTheo: | AB Filosofia da religião NBC Deus VA Filosofia |
| Outras palavras-chave: | B
Modal problem of evil
B Maximal greatness B Modal ontological argument B Plantinga |
| Acesso em linha: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Resumo: | By defining God as a maximally great being Plantinga is able to devise an ontological argument which validly infers from the possibility of there being a God that there necessarily is a God. In this article I shall argue that Plantinga’s argument is not only question-begging, as several critics have complained, but circular in the strongest sense of the term. Based on reflections on the relation between the notions of coherence and possibility, I shall defend two arguments, previously proposed by Tooley (Mind 90:422–427, 1981) and Guleserian (Nous 17:221–238, 1983), against the existence of a maximally great being. The article concludes with some critical remarks on Plantinga’s rationale for conceiving God as such a being. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1572-8684 |
| Obras secundárias: | Enthalten in: International journal for philosophy of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/s11153-021-09810-1 |
