Dating Obadiah to 801 BC

Currently, Old Testament scholars have accepted that it is virtually impossible to ascertain the provenance and date of the biblical book of Obadiah confidently. The majority views the date as soon after the fall of Jerusalem in 587 BC, but this is acknowledged to be tentative. Post-exilic and pre-e...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Riding, Charles Bruce (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: 2021
In: Reformed theological review
Year: 2021, Volume: 80, Issue: 3, Pages: 189-217
IxTheo Classification:HB Old Testament
Further subjects:B historical setting of Obadiah
B Old Testament Introduction
B Obadiah
B dating of Obadiah
B unity of Obadiah
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1796011088
003 DE-627
005 20220322105224.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220318s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.53521/a286  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1796011088 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1796011088 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Riding, Charles Bruce  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Dating Obadiah to 801 BC 
264 1 |c 2021 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Currently, Old Testament scholars have accepted that it is virtually impossible to ascertain the provenance and date of the biblical book of Obadiah confidently. The majority views the date as soon after the fall of Jerusalem in 587 BC, but this is acknowledged to be tentative. Post-exilic and pre-exilic dates are also advocated. This article re-examines the evidence and introduces some more considerations, concluding that an early pre-exilic date for Obadiah is most likely. Elsewhere, the author has redated Joel to 773 BC. Since Joel quotes Obadiah, the book of Obadiah should be dated earlier than that. This article then examines all nine attacks on Jerusalem recorded in the Old Testament to see if what Obadiah describes can be matched to any of them. This leads to the conclusion that Obadiah should be dated to 801 bce, in conjunction with the raid on Jerusalem by a small band of Syrian soldiers as described in 2 Chronicles 24:23-25:24. I propose that some Edomites aided and abetted them in this attack. Obadiah prophesied in between the events recorded in 2 Chronicles 25:16 and 17. If this is so, it sheds light on Amaziah’s attacking Edom, not Syria, for justice and/or revenge (2 Chr 25:11-14). It also offers an explanation for Amaziah’s apostasy to Edomite, not Syrian gods (2 Chr 25:14), and his challenge to Jehoahaz, king of Israel (2 Chr 25:17-24). Other confirming data are presented, and some corollaries are then deduced. 
650 4 |a Old Testament Introduction 
650 4 |a Obadiah 
650 4 |a dating of Obadiah 
650 4 |a historical setting of Obadiah 
650 4 |a unity of Obadiah 
652 |a HB 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Reformed theological review  |d Melbourne, 1942  |g 80(2021), 3, Seite 189-217  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)813203554  |w (DE-600)2804545-2  |w (DE-576)42401243X  |x 0034-3072  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:80  |g year:2021  |g number:3  |g pages:189-217 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.53521/a286  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 80  |j 2021  |e 3  |h 189-217 
951 |a AR 
BIB |a 1 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 409503260X 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1796011088 
LOK |0 005 20220322105224 
LOK |0 008 220318||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442044128  |a HB 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
SUB |a BIB 
SYE 0 0 |a ʻOvadyā,Obadyah,John,Johannes,Obadyah