Why Open Theism Is Natural and Classical Theism Is Not

The cognitive science of religion (CSR) indicates that belief in supernatural agents, or "gods", is underpinned by maturationally natural cognitive biases and systems (Natural Religion). It is unclear, however, whether theism is natural. Does the god concept that our cognitive biases and s...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Launonen, Lari (Author) ; Mullins, R. T. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: MDPI 2021
In: Religions
Year: 2021, Volume: 12, Issue: 11
Further subjects:B Natural Religion
B Open Theism
B natural knowledge of god
B cognitive science of religion
B General Revelation
B Classical Theism
B Divine Attributes
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1795298820
003 DE-627
005 20220311093709.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220310s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.3390/rel12110956  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1795298820 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1795298820 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1237528712  |0 (DE-627)1764231759  |4 aut  |a Launonen, Lari 
109 |a Launonen, Lari 
245 1 0 |a Why Open Theism Is Natural and Classical Theism Is Not 
264 1 |c 2021 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The cognitive science of religion (CSR) indicates that belief in supernatural agents, or "gods", is underpinned by maturationally natural cognitive biases and systems (Natural Religion). It is unclear, however, whether theism is natural. Does the god concept that our cognitive biases and systems give rise to approximate theism? In other words, is Natural Religion "theism-tracking"? As Christian theologians have different views of what God is like, we argue that the answer depends partly on one’s model of God. We discuss two models: classical theism and open theism. We argue that classical theism is far from being natural. The classical divine attributes are very hard to comprehend. Moreover, people naturally conceptualize God as a special sort of person, but the classical God strongly deviates from our cognitive expectations about persons. Open theism is much more natural. However, recent findings in CSR challenge the suggestion that Natural Religion tracks open theism. The possibility that we are "born idolaters" rather than "born believers" might undermine the Christian doctrine of general revelation and attempts to make CSR compatible with theology. 
650 4 |a Natural Religion 
650 4 |a Classical Theism 
650 4 |a cognitive science of religion 
650 4 |a Divine Attributes 
650 4 |a General Revelation 
650 4 |a natural knowledge of god 
650 4 |a Open Theism 
700 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1080675922  |0 (DE-627)845025732  |0 (DE-576)453652662  |4 aut  |a Mullins, R. T. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Religions  |d Basel : MDPI, 2010  |g 12(2021), 11, Artikel-ID 956  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)665435797  |w (DE-600)2620962-7  |w (DE-576)348219067  |x 2077-1444  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:12  |g year:2021  |g number:11  |g elocationid:956 
856 |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/12/11/956/pdf?version=1635834912  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [oa journal (via doaj)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12110956  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/12/11/956  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4086568160 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1795298820 
LOK |0 005 20220310150447 
LOK |0 008 220310||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL