Positioning Religion in International Relations: The Performative, Discursive, and Relational Dimension of Religious Soft Power

Amidst the global religious resurgence in the post-secular world, the field of international relations finds itself unwilling or unable to situate religion back to theoretical paradigms subject to the Westphalian-Enlightenment prejudice. Advocates of religion’s theoretical and empirical significance...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Yang, Zikun (Author) ; Li, Li (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: MDPI 2021
In: Religions
Year: 2021, Volume: 12, Issue: 11
Further subjects:B US foreign policy
B International Relations
B political sociology
B Evangelical
B Religions
B Soft power
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1795129808
003 DE-627
005 20220310150151.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220309s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.3390/rel12110940  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1795129808 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1795129808 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Yang, Zikun  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Positioning Religion in International Relations  |b The Performative, Discursive, and Relational Dimension of Religious Soft Power 
264 1 |c 2021 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Amidst the global religious resurgence in the post-secular world, the field of international relations finds itself unwilling or unable to situate religion back to theoretical paradigms subject to the Westphalian-Enlightenment prejudice. Advocates of religion’s theoretical and empirical significance often turn to religious soft power, a burgeoning theory that gradually becomes the anchorage of discussion but still suffers from conceptual ambiguity and limited explanatory capacity. This essay endeavors to fill in this lacuna by presenting the interdisciplinary attempt to integrate soft power in IR with the three dimensions of power in sociology, which results in a typology of performative, discursive, and relational dimensions of religious soft power. The explanatory and predictive capacity of this model is tested in the empirical case of the evangelical group’s influence on US foreign policy of the post 9/11 Global War on Terror. A process-level historical account based on archival sources furthers scholars’ knowledge of transnational religious actors’ ability to seize both systematic transformations at the international level and contentious dynamics in the domestic environment, which generates a reorientation in norms, identities, and values that contributes to the outcome of foreign policy, thereby answering the un-addressed question of how religion influences domestic and international politics. The bridging of IR, sociology, and historical sociology, three fields often intertwined, suggests a future direction for not only the religious return to IR but also the overcoming of the "intellectual autism" of this discipline, which needs to be better prepared for continuous challenges of soaring populism, nationalism, and clash of civilizations in the twenty-first century. 
601 |a Religion 
601 |a Performance 
601 |a Soft Power 
650 4 |a US foreign policy 
650 4 |a Evangelical 
650 4 |a International Relations 
650 4 |a political sociology 
650 4 |a Religions 
650 4 |a Soft Power 
700 1 |a Li, Li  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Religions  |d Basel : MDPI, 2010  |g 12(2021), 11, Artikel-ID 940  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)665435797  |w (DE-600)2620962-7  |w (DE-576)348219067  |x 2077-1444  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:12  |g year:2021  |g number:11  |g elocationid:940 
856 |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/12/11/940/pdf?version=1635815657  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [oa journal (via doaj)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12110940  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/12/11/940  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 12  |j 2021  |e 11  |i 940 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4084711756 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1795129808 
LOK |0 005 20220309141905 
LOK |0 008 220309||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Soft power 
STB 0 0 |a Soft power 
STC 0 0 |a Poder blando 
STD 0 0 |a Soft power 
STF 0 0 |a 软实力 
STG 0 0 |a Soft power 
STH 0 0 |a Мягкая сила 
SUB |a REL 
SYE 0 0 |a Weiche Macht