The Stratigraphic Relationship between Palaces 1369 and 1052 (Stratum III) at Megiddo

In the recent excavations carried out by the Tel Aviv University expedition to Megiddo, the stratigraphic relations between Buildings 1052 and 1369 were examined. These large edifices were first excavated in the 1930s by the Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago. The Tel Aviv expedition ex...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Reich, Ronny (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: The University of Chicago Press 2003
In: Bulletin of ASOR
Year: 2003, Volume: 331, Pages: 39-44
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1789839033
003 DE-627
005 20240517151310.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220217s2003 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.2307/1357758  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1789839033 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1789839033 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Reich, Ronny  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a The Stratigraphic Relationship between Palaces 1369 and 1052 (Stratum III) at Megiddo 
264 1 |c 2003 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In the recent excavations carried out by the Tel Aviv University expedition to Megiddo, the stratigraphic relations between Buildings 1052 and 1369 were examined. These large edifices were first excavated in the 1930s by the Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago. The Tel Aviv expedition examined the last location where these buildings seem to overlap, and, in Megiddo III, concluded that Building 1052 was constructed first and Building 1369 was added at a later stage, contrary to the prevailing view. After examining the stratigraphic details published in Megiddo III, this paper points out that not a single stratigraphic details or argument was presented that supports this new conclusion. Indeed, the view that Building 1039 was constructed first and Building 1052 was added later must still be the prevailing interpretation. 
601 |a Stratigraphie 
601 |a Megiddo 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |a American Schools of Oriental Research  |t Bulletin of ASOR  |d Chicago, IL : The University of Chicago Press, 1921  |g 331(2003), Seite 39-44  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)330355570  |w (DE-600)2050180-8  |w (DE-576)251821994  |x 2161-8062  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:331  |g year:2003  |g pages:39-44 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/1357758  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.2307/1357758  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.2307/1357758  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo  |a BIIN 
951 |a AR 
BIB |a 1 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4060865761 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1789839033 
LOK |0 005 20220217053031 
LOK |0 008 220217||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-02-09#1809DC488DE4DF64E7A4121284167383834328D9 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/1357758 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
SUB |a BIB