John II Komnenos' campaign in Cilician Armenia

The present paper challenges the assertion that John II Komnenos' first campaign against Cilician Armenia (1137) was directly connected with the conflict between the Byzantines and the Principality of Antioch. The supposed anti-Byzantine alliance between the Armenians and the Crusaders is exami...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Takirtakoglou, Konstantinos ca. 20./21. Jh. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: De Gruyter 2021
In: Byzantinische Zeitschrift
Year: 2021, Volume: 114, Issue: 3, Pages: 1329-1349
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1789502128
003 DE-627
005 20220214121335.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220214s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1515/bz-2021-0065  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1789502128 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1789502128 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1251771998  |0 (DE-627)1789523990  |4 aut  |a Takirtakoglou, Konstantinos  |d ca. 20./21. Jh. 
109 |a Takirtakoglou, Konstantinos ca. 20./21. Jh. 
245 1 0 |a John II Komnenos' campaign in Cilician Armenia 
264 1 |c 2021 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The present paper challenges the assertion that John II Komnenos' first campaign against Cilician Armenia (1137) was directly connected with the conflict between the Byzantines and the Principality of Antioch. The supposed anti-Byzantine alliance between the Armenians and the Crusaders is examined within this context; excerpts from the relevant sources not only cast doubt on its existence, but also allow the assertion that during the period under examination the relations between the Armenians and the Crusaders were hostile. Thus, the issue that arises is the following: If Levon was an enemy of the Crusaders, why did he not stand at the Byzantines' side, instead waging war against them? The assertion of the present paper regarding this policy decision is that it was due to Levon’s alliance with John's primary enemy in the East, the Danishmends. In fact, the sources indicate that the subjugation of Armenia was of greater priority for the Byzantine emperor in his campaign than the conquest of Antioch. This is demonstrated by the fact that John refused to conclude a treaty with the Rubenid lord similar to that which he had concluded with the prince of Antioch, and is supported by the operational maneuvers of the Byzantine forces during the campaign. To connect John's activities in Cilicia with his subsequent campaign in Pontus and the Turkish reactions to these Byzantine strategic moves, the present paper asserts that John's conquest of Cilicia was part of a wider policy of strategic encirclement of the Danishmends. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Byzantinische Zeitschrift  |d Berlin : De Gruyter, 1892  |g 114(2021), 3, Seite 1329-1349  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)568921224  |w (DE-600)2430676-9  |w (DE-576)303577770  |x 1868-9027  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:114  |g year:2021  |g number:3  |g pages:1329-1349 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1515/bz-2021-0065  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/bz-2021-0065/html  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4056380481 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1789502128 
LOK |0 005 20220214094737 
LOK |0 008 220214||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw