LA CONOSCIBILITÀ DI DIO NEL COMMENTO AI NOMI DIVINI

The paper is divided into two parts. First, the author describes the historical context in which Aquinas drafted his commentary on pseudo-Dionysius. The author suggests that the commentary may have been written during Aquinas’s stay in Rome (1265-1267/8), i.e. when Aquinas was writing Summa Theol. I...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Curiello, Gioacchino (Author) ; Curriello, Gioacchino (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:Italian
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Edizioni Studio Domenicano 2015
In: Divus Thomas
Year: 2015, Volume: 118, Issue: 1, Pages: 57-79
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Non-electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1787805565
003 DE-627
005 20220131103843.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220131s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||ita c
035 |a (DE-627)1787805565 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1787805565 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a ita 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Curiello, Gioacchino  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Curiello, Gioacchino 
245 1 0 |a LA CONOSCIBILITÀ DI DIO NEL COMMENTO AI NOMI DIVINI 
264 1 |c 2015 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The paper is divided into two parts. First, the author describes the historical context in which Aquinas drafted his commentary on pseudo-Dionysius. The author suggests that the commentary may have been written during Aquinas’s stay in Rome (1265-1267/8), i.e. when Aquinas was writing Summa Theol. Iª, qu. 12, a question on divine names. The second section of the paper focuses on Aquinas’s claims concerning one’s capacity of knowing God. After having expounded the limits of the human capacity of knowing God, the author expounds on the via remotionis and eminentiae, and on the via causalitatis – the three methods for grasping something of God. The author observes that Aquinas was not eager to agree with pseudo-Dionysius’s agnosticism – and this may be a consequence of the 1241 condemnation of the thesis, according to which the blessed in heaven do not see God’s essence. L’articolo si divide in due parti. Nella prima si discute il contesto storico che fa da sfondo alla stesura del commento tommasiano. L’autore suggerisce che il commento sia databile al periodo romano (1265-1267/8), cioè agli stessi anni in cui Tommaso scriveva Summa Theol. Iª, qu. 12, questione dedicata ai nomi divini. La seconda parte del saggio si concentra sulla conoscibilità di Dio, quale emerge dal commento allo pseudo-Dionigi. Dopo essersi soffermato sui limiti della conoscenza umana di Dio, l’autore analizza la via remotionis ed eminentiae e la via causalitatis per conoscere Dio. L’autore osserva che Tommaso si distacca dall’agnosticismo dionisiano (forse perché nel 1241 era stata condannata la tesi secondo cui è impossibile per i beati vedere l’essenza di Dio). 
700 1 |a Curriello, Gioacchino  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Divus Thomas  |d Bologna : Edizioni Studio Domenicano, 1924  |g 118(2015), 1, Seite 57-79  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)1682363678  |w (DE-600)3000761-6  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:118  |g year:2015  |g number:1  |g pages:57-79 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Druckausgabe  |w (DE-627)1635318548  |k Non-Electronic 
856 4 0 |u https://www.jstor.org/stable/48503759  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4048298518 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1787805565 
LOK |0 005 20220131103843 
LOK |0 008 220131||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-01-11#8B8E74485B4E1B49760C9A058813752FAC4FC099 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL