The Abused Present

Forty years after the publication of Frank Stagg's warning against abuse of the aorist tense, it is time that we examine whether similar warnings need to be sounded regarding the other major tense form—the present tense. Scholars and commentators have frequently understood the present tense for...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: MATHEWSON, DAVID L. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Eisenbrauns 2013
In: Bulletin for biblical research
Year: 2013, Volume: 23, Issue: 3, Pages: 343-363
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Non-electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1787695506
003 DE-627
005 20240228104125.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220129s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.2307/26424833  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1787695506 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1787695506 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a MATHEWSON, DAVID L.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a The Abused Present 
264 1 |c 2013 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Forty years after the publication of Frank Stagg's warning against abuse of the aorist tense, it is time that we examine whether similar warnings need to be sounded regarding the other major tense form—the present tense. Scholars and commentators have frequently understood the present tense form as indicating action that is continuous, durative, or habitual. However, recent research into verbal aspect has suggested that the Greek tense system is an aspectual one, that is, it pertains to how the author chooses to view the action, rather than how the action actually took place. In light of this, the present tense should be understood semantically as the internal viewpoint, looking at the action as in progress, as developing or unfolding. This can be seen from the numerous examples of present tenses in the NT that do not indicate action that is continuous, habitual, or ongoing. The article then surveys representative grammars and commentaries, demonstrating that this notion of continuous and durative action is widespread, but inadequate. It is suggested that commentators and students of the NT rely on the more recent grammatical tools that implement insights from verbal aspect. The article concludes with a summary of implications for interpreting the present tense form. One of the possible functions is to indicate prominence in discourse, to foreground various characters, scenes, or events. Outside of this, the interpreter should be cautious of the conclusions that he/she draws from the present tense form and should avoid reading into it notions of "continuous," "durative," "ongoing," or "habitual" action. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Bulletin for biblical research  |d Winona Lake, Ind. : Eisenbrauns, 1991  |g 23(2013), 3, Seite 343-363  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)612651665  |w (DE-600)2523584-9  |w (DE-576)347283926  |x 2576-0998  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:23  |g year:2013  |g number:3  |g pages:343-363 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Druckausgabe  |w (DE-627)1633398382  |k Non-Electronic 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.2307/26424833  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo  |a BIIN 
951 |a AR 
BIB |a 1 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4047889210 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1787695506 
LOK |0 005 20220129050634 
LOK |0 008 220129||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-01-10#4A0BCBFF914AD8094055D0AB8842BFD036631257 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
SUB |a BIB