The Ending of Mark

With the recognition that Mark 16:8 is the most authentic ending of the second Gospel, debate has raged over whether this is the Evangelist's intended ending or whether his intended ending was lost. In the first part of the 20th century, the predominant view was that the original ending had bee...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Stein, Robert H. 1935- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Eisenbrauns 2008
In: Bulletin for biblical research
Year: 2008, Volume: 18, Issue: 1, Pages: 79-98
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Non-electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1787688496
003 DE-627
005 20240228104855.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220129s2008 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.2307/26423729  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1787688496 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1787688496 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)139839437  |0 (DE-627)703482386  |0 (DE-576)166385298  |4 aut  |a Stein, Robert H.  |d 1935- 
109 |a Stein, Robert H. 1935-  |a Stein, Bob 1935-  |a Stein, Robert Harry 1935- 
245 1 4 |a The Ending of Mark 
264 1 |c 2008 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a With the recognition that Mark 16:8 is the most authentic ending of the second Gospel, debate has raged over whether this is the Evangelist's intended ending or whether his intended ending was lost. In the first part of the 20th century, the predominant view was that the original ending had been lost, but in the latter part of the century this was replaced by the view that 16:8 was Mark's intended ending, and numerous attempts were made to explain how 16:8 serves as a fitting ending for the Gospel. The present article seeks to demonstrate that 16:8 is not the Evangelist's intended ending. The two main arguments given are that Mark 14:28 and 16:7 are Markan insertions that point to a postresurrection meeting of Jesus and the disciples in Galilee and that it is very unlikely that the Evangelist would have left this prophecy unfulfilled by ending abruptly with 16:8. This would be the only unfulfilled prophecy of Jesus in Mark except for the prophecy concerning his parousia. The second argument is that in contrast to modern reader-response interpretations of 16:1–8, the emphasis of these verses is not about the disciples and their failures but on Jesus Christ, the Son of God (1:1), and the key verses are 16:6–7 and not 16:8. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Bulletin for biblical research  |d Winona Lake, Ind. : Eisenbrauns, 1991  |g 18(2008), 1, Seite 79-98  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)612651665  |w (DE-600)2523584-9  |w (DE-576)347283926  |x 2576-0998  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:18  |g year:2008  |g number:1  |g pages:79-98 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Druckausgabe  |w (DE-627)1646357884  |k Non-Electronic 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.2307/26423729  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo  |a BIIN 
951 |a AR 
BIB |a 1 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4047882208 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1787688496 
LOK |0 005 20220129050600 
LOK |0 008 220129||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-01-10#F1E4C41C6AA0EA34ECB5CA4AF4EEBAABF03DDB9A 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
SUB |a BIB