Possible Thomistic Response to Hume’s Law and to Moore’s Open-Question Argument

This article concerns Aquinas's practical doctrine on two philosophical difficulties underlying much contemporary ethical debate. One is Hume's Is-ought thesis and the other is its radical consequence, Moore’s Open-question argument. These ethical paradoxes appear to have their roots in ep...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Trujillo Werner, Augusto ca. 20./21. Jh. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Philosophy Documentation Center 2020
In: Philosophy & theology
Year: 2020, Volume: 32, Issue: 1/2, Pages: 173-191
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Thomas Aquinas 1225-1274 / Moore, George Edward 1873-1958, Principia ethica / Is–ought problem
IxTheo Classification:KAE Church history 900-1300; high Middle Ages
NCA Ethics
TJ Modern history
VA Philosophy
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1787299260
003 DE-627
005 20220215155528.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220127s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.5840/philtheol20201210131  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1787299260 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1787299260 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1250430461  |0 (DE-627)1787299155  |4 aut  |a Trujillo Werner, Augusto  |d ca. 20./21. Jh. 
109 |a Trujillo Werner, Augusto ca. 20./21. Jh.  |a Werner, Augusto Werner ca. 20./21. Jh. 
245 1 0 |a Possible Thomistic Response to Hume’s Law and to Moore’s Open-Question Argument 
264 1 |c 2020 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This article concerns Aquinas's practical doctrine on two philosophical difficulties underlying much contemporary ethical debate. One is Hume's Is-ought thesis and the other is its radical consequence, Moore’s Open-question argument. These ethical paradoxes appear to have their roots in epistemological scepticism and in a deficient anthropology. Possible response to them can be found in that Aquinas’s human intellect (essentially theoretical and practical at the same time) naturally performs three main operations: 1º) To apprehend the intellecta and universal notions ens, verum and bonum. 2º) To formulate the first theoretical and practical principles. 3º) To order that the intellectum and universal good be done and the opposite avoided. Thomistic philosophical response to both predicaments will not be exclusively ethical, but will harmonically embrace ontology, anthropology and epistemology. 
601 |a Argumentation 
652 |a KAE:NCA:TJ:VA 
689 0 0 |d p  |0 (DE-588)118622110  |0 (DE-627)134387503  |0 (DE-576)209132787  |2 gnd  |a Thomas  |c von Aquin, Heiliger  |d 1225-1274 
689 0 1 |d u  |0 (DE-588)4199359-7  |0 (DE-627)105181684  |0 (DE-576)210128232  |a Moore, George Edward  |2 gnd  |d 1873-1958  |t Principia ethica 
689 0 2 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4828355-1  |0 (DE-627)487964608  |0 (DE-576)216965748  |2 gnd  |a Humesches Gesetz 
689 0 |5 (DE-627) 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Philosophy & theology  |d Charlottesville, Va. : Philosophy Documentation Center, 1986  |g 32(2020), 1/2, Seite 173-191  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)372365930  |w (DE-600)2122985-5  |w (DE-576)443081883  |x 2153-828X  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:32  |g year:2020  |g number:1/2  |g pages:173-191 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.5840/philtheol20201210131  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4045631518 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1787299260 
LOK |0 005 20220215155528 
LOK |0 008 220127||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442053844  |a VA 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442052465  |a NCA 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442044462  |a KAE 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442053909  |a TJ 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Is–ought problem 
STB 0 0 |a Loi de Hume 
STC 0 0 |a Problema del ser y el deber ser 
STD 0 0 |a Legge di Hume 
STF 0 0 |a 休謨問題 
STG 0 0 |a Lei de Hume 
STH 0 0 |a Принцип Юма 
SUB |a REL 
SYG 0 0 |a Thomas,von Aquin,1225-1274,Thomas,de Aquino, Heiliger,1225-1274,Thomas,de Aquino,1225-1274,Thomas,ab Aquino, Heiliger,1225-1274,Thomas,ab Aquino,1225-1274,Doctor Angelicus,1225-1274,Dottore angelico,1225-1274,Thomas,Akinatos, Heiliger,1225-1274,Thomas,Akuinatos, Heiliger,1225-1274,Thomas,Aquinatus, Heiliger,1225-1274,Thomas,Aquinas, Heiliger,1225-1274,Thomas,Aquinus, Heiliger,1225-1274,Thomas,Aquinatus, Sanctus,1225-1274,Thōmas,Akinatos, Heiliger,1225-1274,Tommaso,d'Aquino, Heiliger,1225-1274,Thomas,von Aquino, Heiliger,1225-1274,Thomas,von Aquino,1225-1274,Thomas,Aquinatis, Heiliger,1225-1274,Thomas,d'Aquin, Heiliger,1225-1274,Thomas,d'Aquin, Saint,1225-1274,Thomas,de Aquinas, Heiliger,1225-1274,Thomas,Camisensis, Heiliger,1225-1274,Tomás,de Aquino, Heiliger,1225-1274,Tomasz,z Akwinu, Heiliger,1225-1274,Thomas,ho Akinatas, Heiliger,1225-1274,Thomas,Daqui, Heiliger,1225-1274,Tommaso,d'Aquino, San,1225-1274,Tommaso,d'Aquino,1225-1274,Thomas,Aquinas, Saint,1225-1274,Tomás,de Aquino, Santo,1225-1274,Tūmā al-Akwīnī,Heiliger,1225-1274,Thomas,Beatus,1225-1274,Aquinatus, Thomas,Heiliger,1225-1274,Aquin, Thomas,von, Heiliger,1225-1274,Aquino, Thomas,von, Heiliger,1225-1274,Aquinas, Thomas,de, Heiliger,1225-1274,Aquino, Tommaso,d', Heiliger,1225-1274,Aquino, Thomas,de, Heiliger,1225-1274,Aquino, Tomás,de, Heiliger,1225-1274,Aquinas, Thomas,Heiliger,1225-1274,Aquinas, Thomas,Saint,1225-1274,Aquino, Tommaso Niccolò,d', Heiliger,1225-1274,Aquino, Tommaso N.,d', Heiliger,1225-1274,Akvinskij, Foma,Heiliger,1225-1274,Aquinas,Heiliger,1225-1274,Akwīnī, Tūmā,al-, Heiliger,1225-1274,Foma,Akvinskij, Heiliger,1225-1274,Daqui, Thomas,Seut,1225-1274,Pseudo-Thomas,von Aquin,1225-1274,Pseudo-Thomas,Aquinas,1225-1274,Pseudo-Thomas,de Aquino,1225-1274,Thomas,Aquinas, Saint,1225-1274,Ak'vineli, T'oma,Saint,1225-1274,Akvinietis, Tomas,Saint,1225-1274,Akvinskii, Foma,Saint,1225-1274,Aquinas,1225-1274,Aquinas, Thomas,Saint,1225-1274,Foma,Akvinskiĭ, Saint,1225-1274,Thomas,Aquinas, Saint,1225-1274,Thomas,av Aquino, Saint,1225-1274,Thomas,d'Aquin, Saint,1225-1274,Thomas,von Aquin, Saint,1225-1274,T'oma,Ak'vineli, Saint,1225-1274,Toma,Akvinski, Saint,1225-1274,Toma,Akvinskii, Saint,1225-1274,Toma,Akvins'kyi, Saint,1225-1274,Toma,ot Akvino, Saint,1225-1274,Tomas,Akvinietis, Saint,1225-1274,Tomas,de Aquino, Saint,1225-1274,Tomasu,Akuinasu, Saint,1225-1274,Tomasu,Akwinasu, Saint,1225-1274,Tomasz,Akwinu, Saint,1225-1274,Tommaso,d'Aquino, Saint,1225-1274,T'ovma,Ak'uinats'i Saint,1225-1274,Thomas,'o Akinatos, Saint,1225-1274,Thomas,'o Akinates, Saint,1225-1274,Thomas,'o Akuinatos, Saint,1225-1274,Thomas,'o Akuinates, Saint,1225-1274,Tomás,de Aquino, Saint,1225-1274,Aquin, Thomas von,1225-1274,Aquino, Thomas von,1225-1274,Тома,Аквінський, Saint,1225-1274,Pתומאס אקווינאס,1225-1274,Pתומס אקווינס,1225-1274,اكويني ، توما,1225-1274 , Humesches Prinzip,Humes Sein-Sollen-Fehlschluss