Re-thinking What We Think About Derrida

Although many still see Derrida as a thinker opposed to a unified systematic meaning, there has recently been growing recognition that Derrida, in his later years, suggested that his work is not averse to formalisation. In support of this view, this paper points out that, in 1990, Derrida himself to...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Galetti, Dino (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Rhodes University 2010
In: The Indo-Pacific journal of phenomenology
Year: 2010, Volume: 10, Issue: 2, Pages: 1-18
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1786278553
003 DE-627
005 20220117155249.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220117s2010 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.2989/IPJP.2010.10.2.6.1087  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1786278553 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1786278553 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Galetti, Dino  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Re-thinking What We Think About Derrida 
264 1 |c 2010 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Although many still see Derrida as a thinker opposed to a unified systematic meaning, there has recently been growing recognition that Derrida, in his later years, suggested that his work is not averse to formalisation. In support of this view, this paper points out that, in 1990, Derrida himself told us that his first work of 1954 reveals a "law" which impels his career, and that some responses had arisen even there. Some benefits of adopting such a common pole are set out, and an interrelated "system" developed to relate the law of 1954 to the later responses, in order to help find a common, systematic base for Derrida’s oeuvre. The need to accommodate approaches which are wary of a systematic approach is nevertheless acknowledged, and possible ways of reconciling the diverse readings of Derrida’s intent and collaboratively furthering the formalisation of Derrida’s oeuvre for posterity are outlined in closing. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t The Indo-Pacific journal of phenomenology  |d Grahamstown : Rhodes University, 2001  |g 10(2010), 2, Seite 1-18  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)503330728  |w (DE-600)2210800-2  |w (DE-576)281292809  |x 1445-7377  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:10  |g year:2010  |g number:2  |g pages:1-18 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.2989/IPJP.2010.10.2.6.1087  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4036746642 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1786278553 
LOK |0 005 20220117155249 
LOK |0 008 220117||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a rwrk 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL