Is there Stylometric Evidence for Q?
Stylometric tests were run to assess whether, in Matthew, Q material differs in style from that of M. Correspondence Analysis was used on larger samples. Then counts of the five most frequent words in smaller samples were tested using three further methods: GLM, Discriminant Analysis and Cluster Ana...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
2011
|
| In: |
New Testament studies
Year: 2011, Volume: 57, Issue: 4, Pages: 483-507 |
| Further subjects: | B
stylometry
B Gospels B Synoptic B Statistics B Greek B Source |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Parallel Edition: | Electronic
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1785739867 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20221219190645.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220112s2011 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/S002868851100018X |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1785739867 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1785739867 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1100883959 |0 (DE-627)85961400X |0 (DE-576)421119527 |4 aut |a Mealand, David L. |d 1938- | |
| 109 | |a Mealand, David L. 1938- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Is there Stylometric Evidence for Q? |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2011 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Stylometric tests were run to assess whether, in Matthew, Q material differs in style from that of M. Correspondence Analysis was used on larger samples. Then counts of the five most frequent words in smaller samples were tested using three further methods: GLM, Discriminant Analysis and Cluster Analysis. These tests assigned about 80% of the samples to the expected source. This result permits a cautious preference for the Two Source Theory against the theory upheld by Farrer, Goulder and Goodacre. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Synoptic | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Statistics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a stylometry | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Source | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Gospels | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Greek | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t New Testament studies |d Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1954 |g 57(2011), 4, Seite 483-507 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)300895283 |w (DE-600)1483312-8 |w (DE-576)079165583 |x 1469-8145 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:57 |g year:2011 |g number:4 |g pages:483-507 |
| 776 | |i Erscheint auch als |n elektronische Ausgabe |w (DE-627)1646735560 |k Electronic | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S002868851100018X |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/new-testament-studies/article/is-there-stylometric-evidence-for-q/7F8BEF617E996B4BA74DAEABA8DA77A6 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo |a BIIN | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| BIB | |a 1 | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4033802401 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1785739867 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20220112044352 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-01-05#BA2EAD651590B58C4941D998F17290BF1301AD80 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| SUB | |a BIB | ||