Q as Hypothesis: A Study in Methodology
Arguments for the Q hypothesis have changed little since B. H. Streeter. The purpose of this article is not to advocate an alternative hypothesis but to argue that, if the Q hypothesis is to be sustained, the unlikelihood of Luke's dependence on Matthew must be demonstrated by a systematic and...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
2009
|
| In: |
New Testament studies
Year: 2009, Volume: 55, Issue: 4, Pages: 397-415 |
| Further subjects: | B
Synoptic Problem
B two source hypothesis B Source Criticism |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Parallel Edition: | Electronic
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1785739530 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20221219190713.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220112s2009 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/S0028688509990026 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1785739530 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1785739530 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1037468244 |0 (DE-627)755793579 |0 (DE-576)189090979 |4 aut |a Watson, Francis |d 1956- | |
| 109 | |a Watson, Francis 1956- |a Watson, Francis Benedict 1956- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Q as Hypothesis: A Study in Methodology |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2009 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Arguments for the Q hypothesis have changed little since B. H. Streeter. The purpose of this article is not to advocate an alternative hypothesis but to argue that, if the Q hypothesis is to be sustained, the unlikelihood of Luke's dependence on Matthew must be demonstrated by a systematic and comprehensive reconstruction of the redactional procedures entailed in the two hypotheses. The Q hypothesis will have been verified if (and only if) it generates a more plausible account of the Matthean and Lukan redaction of Mark and Q than the corresponding account of Luke's use of Mark and Matthew. | ||
| 601 | |a Methodologie | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a two source hypothesis | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Source Criticism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Synoptic Problem | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Q | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t New Testament studies |d Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1954 |g 55(2009), 4, Seite 397-415 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)300895283 |w (DE-600)1483312-8 |w (DE-576)079165583 |x 1469-8145 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:55 |g year:2009 |g number:4 |g pages:397-415 |
| 776 | |i Erscheint auch als |n elektronische Ausgabe |w (DE-627)1646735196 |k Electronic | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0028688509990026 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/new-testament-studies/article/q-as-hypothesis-a-study-in-methodology/9C0993A88A74C3A8223E17E73E281D18 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo |a BIIN | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 55 |j 2009 |e 4 |h 397-415 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| BIB | |a 1 | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 403380207X | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1785739530 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20220112044351 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-01-05#CFE95ADCE0D1C81A403B93459AE1ECA1C0968829 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| SUB | |a BIB | ||