On Dispensing with Q?: Goodacre on the Relation of Luke to Matthew

The case against Q depends logically on the plausibility of Luke's direct use of Matthew. Goodacre's carefully argued book contends (a) that none of the objections to the Mark-without-Q hypothesis is valid; (b) that given certain assumptions about Luke's aesthetic preferences, it is p...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kloppenborg, John S. 1951- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge Univ. Press 2003
In: New Testament studies
Year: 2003, Volume: 49, Issue: 2, Pages: 210-236
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 178573766X
003 DE-627
005 20221219190950.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220112s2003 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1017/S0028688503000110  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)178573766X 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP178573766X 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)131824279  |0 (DE-627)515629138  |0 (DE-576)165330678  |4 aut  |a Kloppenborg, John S.  |d 1951- 
109 |a Verbin, John S. K. 1951-  |a Kloppenborg-Verbin, John S. 1951-  |a Verbin, John S. Kloppenborg 1951-  |a Kloppenborg-Verbin, John 1951-  |a Kloppenborg Verbin, John 1951-  |a Kloppenborg Verbin, John S. 1951-  |a Kloppenborg, J. 1951-  |a Verbin, John 1951-  |a Verbin, John S. 1951-  |a Kloppenborg, J. S. 1951-  |a Verbin, J. S. K. 1951-  |a Kloppenborg, John 1951-  |a Kloppenborg, John S. 1951-  |a Verbin, J. S. 1951-  |a Verbin, J. 1951- 
245 1 0 |a On Dispensing with Q?: Goodacre on the Relation of Luke to Matthew 
264 1 |c 2003 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The case against Q depends logically on the plausibility of Luke's direct use of Matthew. Goodacre's carefully argued book contends (a) that none of the objections to the Mark-without-Q hypothesis is valid; (b) that given certain assumptions about Luke's aesthetic preferences, it is plausible that he systematically reordered the ‘Q’ material from Matthew; (c) that Luke's rearrangement of Matthew shows as much intelligence and purposefulness as Matthew's; and (d) that certain features of the ‘Q’ in Luke 3–7 betray the influence of Matthean redaction. Careful scrutiny of these arguments shows that (a) is only partially true; that Goodacre's assumptions about Lukan aesthetics (b) are open to serious objection; and that while (c) is true, Goodacre's argument in (d) ultimately cuts against his case against Q. 
601 |a Dispens 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t New Testament studies  |d Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1954  |g 49(2003), 2, Seite 210-236  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)300895283  |w (DE-600)1483312-8  |w (DE-576)079165583  |x 1469-8145  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:49  |g year:2003  |g number:2  |g pages:210-236 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0028688503000110  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/new-testament-studies/article/on-dispensing-with-q-goodacre-on-the-relation-of-luke-to-matthew/AC49CBE35C69BE06CC41707C82F237FF  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo  |a BIIN 
951 |a AR 
BIB |a 1 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4033800204 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 178573766X 
LOK |0 005 20220112044344 
LOK |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-01-05#CAB31B45C06CC30E517E8F9397A43CBB9D78114A 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
SUB |a BIB