On the Relationship between Matthew and Luke

The Synoptic Problem continues to be the subject of scholarly debate, and the traditional two-document hypothesis is not universally accepted today. One major tenet of the traditional theory is that Matthew and Luke are independent of each other, both depending on common source material, usually cal...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tuckett, Christopher M. 1948- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge Univ. Press 1984
In: New Testament studies
Year: 1984, Volume: 30, Issue: 1, Pages: 130-142
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Non-electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1785732102
003 DE-627
005 20221219192340.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220112s1984 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1017/S0028688500007037  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1785732102 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1785732102 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)141748400  |0 (DE-627)631178619  |0 (DE-576)164253300  |4 aut  |a Tuckett, Christopher M.  |d 1948- 
109 |a Tuckett, Christopher M. 1948-  |a Tuckett, C.M. 1948-  |a Tuckett, C. M. 1948-  |a Tuckett, Christopher 1948-  |a Tuckett, Christopher Mark 1948- 
245 1 0 |a On the Relationship between Matthew and Luke 
264 1 |c 1984 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The Synoptic Problem continues to be the subject of scholarly debate, and the traditional two-document hypothesis is not universally accepted today. One major tenet of the traditional theory is that Matthew and Luke are independent of each other, both depending on common source material, usually called ‘Q’. In a recent article entitled ‘On Putting Q to the Test’, Dr M. D. Goulder has sought to question the traditional theory by giving a number of examples which, he claims, show conclusively that Luke knew Matthew. Goulder's method is to look for parallel texts where there is an agreement between Matthew and Luke against Mark, satisfying two further conditions: that Matthew's text is redactional, and that Luke's text is un-Lukan (p. 219). The first of these two conditions precludes possible appeal to Q; the second precludes appeal to independent redaction by Luke of the Markan text. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t New Testament studies  |d Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1954  |g 30(1984), 1, Seite 130-142  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)300895283  |w (DE-600)1483312-8  |w (DE-576)079165583  |x 1469-8145  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:30  |g year:1984  |g number:1  |g pages:130-142 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Druckausgabe  |w (DE-627)831697334  |k Non-Electronic 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0028688500007037  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/new-testament-studies/article/on-the-relationship-between-matthew-and-luke/A75BB12DF0CE5416FE175E59D81AD0B2  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo  |a BIIN 
936 u w |d 30  |j 1984  |e 1  |h 130-142 
951 |a AR 
BIB |a 1 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4033794646 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1785732102 
LOK |0 005 20220112044325 
LOK |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-01-05#9C83AAB0F6E5B7EF3BD5039307D18DEA2534BA3C 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
SUB |a BIB