The Major Agreements of Matthew and Luke Against Mark

The problem of the relationship between the first three gospels still awaits a final solution. Even the priority of Mark, the keystone of Synoptic criticism as it was developed by such scholars as B. H. Streeter, has been challenged in recent years. However, the majority of critical scholars are agr...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Simpson, R. T. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge Univ. Press 1966
In: New Testament studies
Year: 1966, Volume: 12, Issue: 3, Pages: 273-284
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1785726951
003 DE-627
005 20221219193249.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220112s1966 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1017/S0028688500003283  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1785726951 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1785726951 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Simpson, R. T.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a The Major Agreements of Matthew and Luke Against Mark 
264 1 |c 1966 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The problem of the relationship between the first three gospels still awaits a final solution. Even the priority of Mark, the keystone of Synoptic criticism as it was developed by such scholars as B. H. Streeter, has been challenged in recent years. However, the majority of critical scholars are agreed that the careful study of the discrepancies between Mark itself, and those sections of Matthew and Luke which are closest to Mark, leads to the conclusion that St Matthew and St Luke worked directly from the written text of that gospel. Even Abbot Butler, the most thoroughgoing of the protagonists of the priority of Matthew, does not in fact deny that Matthew and Luke frequently offer what appears to be an ‘improved’ version of Mark. No doubt it is possible to explain the more primitive character of Mark as Butler does, by supposing that St Peter may have made Matthew the basis of his preaching, and that Mark therefore represents a Petrine version of Matthew. Nevertheless, the majority of scholars are (rightly) agreed in adopting the more economical explanation that the Matthean and Lucan ‘improvements’ upon the text of Mark indicate that both St Matthew and St Luke had a copy of that gospel before them as they wrote. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t New Testament studies  |d Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1954  |g 12(1966), 3, Seite 273-284  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)300895283  |w (DE-600)1483312-8  |w (DE-576)079165583  |x 1469-8145  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:12  |g year:1966  |g number:3  |g pages:273-284 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n elektronische Ausgabe  |w (DE-627)1640567739  |k Electronic 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0028688500003283  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/new-testament-studies/article/major-agreements-of-matthew-and-luke-against-mark/B580E03796B506B49A232D6F91C513CA  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo  |a BIIN 
951 |a AR 
BIB |a 1 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4033789499 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1785726951 
LOK |0 005 20220112044303 
LOK |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-01-05#DC9A2D6F8245ABBD13B557BF286F811FED6033C8 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
SUB |a BIB