The Immorality of Having Children
This paper defends the Famine Relief Argument against Having Children, which goes as follows: conceiving and raising a child costs hundreds of thousands of dollars; that money would be far better spent on famine relief; therefore, conceiving and raising children is immoral. It is named after Peter S...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
2014
|
In: |
Ethical theory and moral practice
Year: 2014, Volume: 17, Issue: 3, Pages: 567-582 |
Further subjects: | B
Peter Singer
B Happiness B Poverty B Parenthood B Procreation B Children |
Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1785698303 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20220112044112.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 220112s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10677-013-9458-8 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1785698303 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1785698303 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Rachels, Stuart |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 4 | |a The Immorality of Having Children |
264 | 1 | |c 2014 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a This paper defends the Famine Relief Argument against Having Children, which goes as follows: conceiving and raising a child costs hundreds of thousands of dollars; that money would be far better spent on famine relief; therefore, conceiving and raising children is immoral. It is named after Peter Singer’s Famine Relief Argument because it might be a special case of Singer’s argument and because it exposes the main practical implication of Singer’s argument—namely, that we should not become parents. I answer five objections: that disaster would ensue if nobody had children; that having children cannot be wrong because it is so natural for human beings; that the argument demands too much of us; that my child might be a great benefactor to the world; and that we should raise our children frugally and give them the right values rather than not have them. Previous arguments against procreation have appealed either to a pessimism about human life, or to the environmental impact of overpopulation, or to the fact that we cannot obtain the consent of the non-existent. The argument proposed here appeals to the severe opportunity costs of parenting. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Procreation | |
650 | 4 | |a Poverty | |
650 | 4 | |a Peter Singer | |
650 | 4 | |a Parenthood | |
650 | 4 | |a Happiness | |
650 | 4 | |a Children | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Ethical theory and moral practice |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1998 |g 17(2014), 3, Seite 567-582 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320527093 |w (DE-600)2015306-5 |w (DE-576)104558555 |x 1572-8447 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:17 |g year:2014 |g number:3 |g pages:567-582 |
856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/24478668 |x JSTOR | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-013-9458-8 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
936 | u | w | |d 17 |j 2014 |e 3 |h 567-582 |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4033757201 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1785698303 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20220112044112 | ||
LOK | |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-30#9ED21585D2722C2D8AD5358BA348F02173519B16 | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/24478668 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw |