The Relative Moral Risks of Untargeted and Targeted Surveillance

Is surveillance that is targeted towards specific individuals easier to justify than surveillance that targets broad categories of people? Untargeted surveillance is routinely accused of treating innocent people as suspects in ways that are unfair and of failing to pursue security effectively. I arg...

ver descrição completa

Na minha lista:  
Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor principal: Hadjimatheou, Katerina (Author)
Tipo de documento: Recurso Electrónico Artigo
Idioma:Inglês
Verificar disponibilidade: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Carregar...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publicado em: Springer Science + Business Media B. V 2014
Em: Ethical theory and moral practice
Ano: 2014, Volume: 17, Número: 2, Páginas: 187-207
Outras palavras-chave:B Privacy
B Discrimination
B Surveillance
B Reciprocity
B Estigmatização
Acesso em linha: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Descrição
Resumo:Is surveillance that is targeted towards specific individuals easier to justify than surveillance that targets broad categories of people? Untargeted surveillance is routinely accused of treating innocent people as suspects in ways that are unfair and of failing to pursue security effectively. I argue that in a wide range of cases untargeted surveillance treats people less like suspects than more targeted alternatives. I also argue that it often deters unwanted behaviour more effectively than targeted alternatives, including profiling. In practice, untargeted surveillance is likely to be least costly morally and most efficient when used as a means of enforcing the rules of a specific activity or institution. Targeted alternatives are likely to be more appropriate means of law enforcement.
ISSN:1572-8447
Obras secundárias:Enthalten in: Ethical theory and moral practice
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1007/s10677-013-9428-1